>BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO
>Re: http://www.newsscan.com/cgi-bin/findit_view?table=newsletter&id=1870
>       If you read between the lines, as well as the item that ran a couple
>of weeks ago that IE 5.5 will be supporting MS proprietary standards at the
>expense of open standards, it's pretty clear that MS is making a major push
>to turn the web into its private property. In view of MS's history of
>innovation (near zilch outside of strong-arm marketing, maybe) and product
>quality, well, to say the thought is scary is an understatement. Example:
>consider the drop in web-based sales that would result. Let's do the math:
>Decreased sales for businesses; indirectly higher prices to consumers (since
>cheap prices become more expensive to sellers to compensate for decreased
>sales and site visitors); a single business benefits: MS. These guys in
>Redmond are doing their damnedest to make sure even their supporters on the
>DC Circuit Court can't help them. It may be late in the game to note this,
>but: a) the integration of Explorer into Windows (which was never much more
>than a marketing thing and nothing of much substance -- actually, a stupid
>idea if one as alleged) is just about the least important issue, and b)
>Judge Jackson apparently, and unfortunately for MS, keeps up on the news. A
>break-up of MS is beginning to look like an imperative, not just a good
>idea. (Mitchell Senft)

http://www.newsscan.com/


janet paterson
53 now / 41 dx / 37 onset
613 256 8340 / PO Box 171 Almonte Ontario K0A 1A0 Canada
visit my website "a new voice" at: http://www.geocities.com/janet313/