Hi Terry,
I do have PD have had it from 1997 had signs of something wrong for at least
5 years before. I was also replying to the big NO SPERM thing you do not
need it to make life NOW.
----- Original Message -----
From: Terry Bowers <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 6:14 AM
Subject: Re: Debra/no sperm in SCNT


> Dear Janice,
>
> I for one am opposed to reproductive cloning, which aims to create human
> beings by cloning human embryos. But I'm not alone. Patients advocacy
groups
> and leading scientists, including the National Academy of Sciences, and a
> huge majority of the American people agree that human reproductive cloning
> should not be pursued.
>
>  What we're talking about here is that SCNT could lead to dramatic new
> treatments and cures for now-incurable diseases and medical conditions.
SCNT
> could be used to help nearly 100 million Americans suffer from cancer,
> Alzheimer's, diabetes, Parkinson's, spinal cord injuries, heart disease,
> ALS, and other devastating conditions for which treatments must still be
> found. Proof of the principle for SCNT has been established in recently
> published research on disease in mice.Moreover SCNT is widely supported in
> the U.S., for instance by the Nation's leading medical scientists,
including
> the National Academy of Sciences, major patient advocacy organizations,
the
> American public, Republicans and Democrats and religious leaders.
>
> However the Brownback bill would have devastating results. It would ban
> SCNT, or therapeutic cloning, cutting-off hope to millions of Americans
with
> life-threatening diseases; make it illegal for U.S. citizens to seek SCNT
> treatment abroad.  This means that a patient who may have little hope left
> could be thrown in jail upon re-entry to the U.S. if they went to another
> country to have treatment using SCNT. The bill calls for sending any U.S.
> scientist to jail for developing SCNT therapies in a petri dish; makes it
> illegal for U.S. scientists to import SCNT therapies that were developed
in
> other countries. In short, passage of Brownback-or any ban on this
> research-runs counter to our nation's history as the world's leader in
> biomedical research.Even a temporary ban on SCNT (such as a moratorium)
> would cripple this promising field and delay patients' access to
potentially
> life-saving treatments.
>
> And one final point that I would like to make.  When we start saying when
> life begins and when life ends and God is for this science and God is
> against that science, we limit God. How can we as His creation begin to
know
> the true mind of God?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Terry Bowers
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Janice Morgan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 5:40 AM
> Subject: Re: Debra/no sperm in SCNT
>
>
> > Dear Rayilyn Brown,
> >  I hear what you are saying, does that mean that Dolly the sheep that
was
> a
> > clone from an egg no sperm not a real sheep. What about the kitten that
> came
> > from an egg no sperm was that a real kitten. I saw on TV where and
> > independent company cloned an mans DNA from an egg and they said if it
was
> > implanted into an woman it would become a child. Just because there is
no
> > sperm involved does not mean there is no life. Janice
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:
mailto:[log in to unmask]
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn