LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L Archives

CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L  May 2002

CASLL-L May 2002

Subject:

Re: "Authentic" Writing

From:

Russ Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 22 May 2002 12:16:05 -0300

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (69 lines)

I am having the hardest time keeping up with this discussion.  I start thinking about it and
before I can clear my head someone else weighs in to pre-empt or render silly what I was going
to say.  Sort of like trying to get the timing right as the rope comes round, so I can get in
and skip, too . . .

Let me do something simple, then: I want to back away from two dichotomous pairs of terms I've
introduced here: "real / unreal" and "authentic / inauthentic."   And let me back away, too,
from the distinction between "academic" and "workplace."  Not that I don't think all those
distinctions aren't real, or don't matter; they're just clearly not the ones I'm trying to
focus attention on, and they certainly don't map onto each other.

I'm interested in Anthony's suggestion that we think about what writing _does_.  But when I
read the rest of that paragraph, it doesn't seem to me to capture what I want, either.

> what ends does it have? Are the ends appropriate/authentic to
> the context -- that is, do they serve something beyond the
> performance of the task, something with implications for the
> world that the writing grows out of and enters into (a world
> that includes the writer)? Will the writing have consequences,
> change anything, cause action of some sort?

It's pretty hard to imagine a disciplined way to distinguish between the writing that's
produced as an _example_ (thank you again, Anne Freadman) -- a way of demonstrating that the
writer can write, and can write in some form or demonstrating some knowledge -- and writing
that's produced to persuade or inform. Both serve something beyond the performance of the task,
both have implications for the world, both are, well, "real."  What I want somehow to find a
way to talk about is writing that -- for the writer as she's writing it -- has what I think
Bakhtin might call "addressivity."  In other words, maybe (and I'm resisting the word here
because in a way it's my hobbyhorse) it's "dialogic."  (Patrick's anticipated this point, as he
so often does . . . ) That is, it's an utterance that's linked substantively to a previous
utterance (or utterances), and expects a substantive response.  I think that defines out much
school writing, and includes much workplace writing (though clearly not all, in either case).

I'm now worried about the word "substantive" there.  What I mean is that the utterances are
connected by _what they say_.  Thus it would clearly be a _response_ to what I just said to
say, "Russ, you're obsessing about ideas that really aren't very important," or "Russ, you use
dashes and parentheses _way_ too much," it wouldn't, in my sense, be a substantive response of
the kind I'm looking for.

There are a whole bunch of other issues in this discussion I want to come back to, but let me
start by posing that as a question: does it make sense to say, as I think I'd like to, that
people learning to use written language need (and rarely get) occasions in which their language
is uttered in that sort of context -- where it's part of a dialogue, where substantive,
dialogic responses are the mechanism by which it links to the world?  Where there is an
expectation that an actual reader interested in what's being said will be actually persuaded,
informed, amused, touched, etc. (or not?)  To quote Patrick:

> Students [I'd say learners] need to be writing for the here
> and now, from their own needs, as defined by them.  It is only
> then they will be able to judge for themselves if they are
> accomplishing what they set out to do, and what remains to be
> done.

That "judge for themselves" is important here, too.

-- Russ

St. Thomas University
http://www.stu.ca/~hunt/

                -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
  [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
         write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]

For the list archives and information about the organization,
    its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
              http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
                 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager