Fist of all, no offense meant, Rob (as always). It's just something I've
been thinking about.
Just one clarification;
[log in to unmask] wrote:
>Natasha's point that "Those who understand and still do it -- as we all know,
>they are doomed professionally, so they'll be punished more seriously than any
>university can punish them, and I can hardly do anything about them" seems
>like a washing of hands AND seems naive. Doomed professionally!??!?
>
We all need to keep in mind that using other people's materials is
sometimes considered appropriate in specific contexts. Thus, not all
technical reports based on previous investigations always refer to those
previous materials: they are often considered part of one continuing
project, even though the authors may be different and there may be a gap
in time.
In addition, a recent plagiarism case by a group of an IEEE magazine
article authors has proved again that sooner or later many people who
intentionally plagiarize for personal gain become exposed (sometimes, it
happens much later that we all would like it to, and sometimes they do
not become exposed like many criminals.). Such exposure effectively
ends their careers. I'm the one for preventive measures rather than for
punishment.
Natasha
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
[log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]
For the list archives and information about the organization,
its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|