LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L Archives

CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L  May 2004

CASLL-L May 2004

Subject:

Re: Essays Graded by Computers

From:

Jo-Anne Andre <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

CASLL/Inkshed <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 26 May 2004 12:16:39 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (184 lines)

Whenever I read of the increasing use of computers to assess student writing, I
always think of the huge outcry that would meet a proposal to grade student essays
in, say, Social Studies or History by computer. Why would such a proposal be
"thinkable" in the context of writing assessment but unthinkable in the context of
a content-area course? How have we as writing teachers (and our predecessors)
contributed to a larger culture in which computerized assessment of writing is not
only considered possible but also accepted as reasonable? It appears that our
perceived preoccupations with grammatical correctness have come to haunt us...

Jo-Anne Andre
U of Calgary

Tosh Tachino wrote:

> As a former (human rater) of a standardized testing, I am mildly interested in
> this issue of the ability of the computer to grade standardized essays, and
> apparently, it is making progress to the pilot stage.  The following is an
> article in NY Times, describing Indiana's attempt to computerize essay grading
> in a standardized test.
>
> While reading the article, I was struck by a few things that makes me skeptical
>
> about computer grading and wondered if machines can ever really simulate (and
> eventually replace?) human raters.
>
> - It is rather troubling to find that the article discusses essay grading as a
> matter of spelling and grammar.  The article seems to foreground computer's
> ability to judge grammaticality of the sentences, de-emphasizing/ignoring more
> important issues such as its ability to comprehend and respond to the content
> of the essay and evaluate the rhetorical effectiveness of the essay.
>
> - I am also concerned about the effect the machine grading might have on
> student writers whose essays will never be read by another human being.  Sure,
> the students in standardized testing already do not receive human responses
> from the raters, but I fear the changes might further push the perception that
> writing is all about fixed formulae rather than a genuine human response to a
> rhetorical situation.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> (Source http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/19/education/19indiana.htm)
>
> May 19, 2004
> Indiana Essays Being Graded by Computers
> By SOL HURWITZ
>
> INDIANAPOLIS - In the computer lab at Warren Central High School in mid-May,
> Craig Butler, a junior, squinted at the question on his screen, paused to
> ponder his answer and began typing.
>
> Craig was one of 48,500 Indiana juniors gathering in high schools across the
> state to take the end-of-year online English essay test. Unlike most essay
> tests, however, this one is being graded not by a teacher but by a computer.
>
> Craig has already decided he prefers computer grading. "Teachers, you know,
> they're human, so they have to stumble around telling you what you need to do,"
>
> he said at a practice session. "A computer can put it in fine print what you
> did wrong and how to fix it."
>
> But his English teacher, Richard P. Dayment, wonders whether the computer is up
>
> to the task. "For the computer to do the subjective grading that's necessary on
>
> an essay, I'll want to see it before I have faith in it," he said.
>
> Indiana is the first state to use a computer-scored English essay test in a
> statewide assessment, and its experience could influence testing decisions in
> other states. Eighteen states now require students to pass a writing test for
> high school graduation, and, starting next year, both the SAT and the ACT will
> include writing in their college admission exams.
>
> "In five years at least 10 more states will be at or beyond the pilot stage" of
>
> automated essay scoring, predicts Richard Swartz, executive director of
> technology products and services at the Educational Testing Service, designers
> of Indiana's online essay-grading software.
>
> While Indiana's essay test is not a pass-fail "high stakes" test, it is part of
>
> an assessment of student achievement in the 40-credit state curriculum, known
> as Core 40, recommended by Indiana educators and business leaders as
> preparation for success in college and the work force. Scores on the Core 40
> tests, offered for the first time this year in English and algebra, will help
> determine college readiness and course placement for students and the
> performance ratings of high schools.
>
> With the increasing number of mandates to test student writing, "there's a
> certain inevitability to computerized essay grading," said Stan Jones,
> Indiana's commissioner of higher education. Indiana's computerized essay
> scoring, he said, will reduce by half the cost of administering a pencil-and-
> paper test and will free teachers from distributing, collecting and, above all,
>
> grading thousands of test booklets.
>
> Moreover, automated grading will yield almost instant results, allowing
> teachers to provide immediate feedback to their students. It would take weeks
> or months to receive grades on a statewide pencil-and-paper test.
>
> To dispel skepticism over computer scoring, student essays were simultaneously
> graded by a computer and trained readers during a two-year pilot program. Using
>
> artificial intelligence to mimic the grading process of human readers, the
> computer's automated scoring engine, known as e-rater, generated grades on a
> six-point scale that were virtually identical to those of the readers.
>
> Still, skepticism abounds. Although English teachers at Warren Central applaud
> the computer's ability to evaluate spelling, punctuation, grammar and
> organization, Richard C. Reed, the department chairman, made it clear that "we
> are not 100 percent sold on the computer's ability to grade content."
>
> Kathryn L. Allison, the English department chairwoman at North Central High
> School nearby, doubts that the computer can accurately assess the quality of
> grammatically correct and well-structured student essays that lack substance or
>
> are wrong on the facts. "Are kids going to be rewarded for having pedestrian-
> type answers?" she asked.
>
> Students, too, worry about the computer's accuracy.
>
> "I always wonder if, like, the computer is going to grade everything right,"
> said Jared Rampersaud, a senior at North Central, who took the test during the
> 2003 trial run, adding that "the teacher knows me and the computer doesn't."
> Jared's classmate Mollie Mott agreed. "We're always told that even the computer
>
> makes mistakes," she said. "I just think it helps if a person can actually look
>
> at" the essay.
>
> How soon other states will emulate Indiana will depend, in part, on how well
> the machine's performance compares to that of human graders. So far, pilot
> tests in Oregon, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and South Dakota have failed to
> persuade those states to abandon human grading.
>
> Access to computers and the Internet is, of course, critical. Indiana ranks
> among the top 10 states in student access to computer technology, with one
> instructional computer for every three students, according to a report
> published in May by Education Week magazine, and all of Indiana's public high
> schools are wired for high-speed Internet.
>
> Even so, scheduling is tricky. "Let's say you've got a computer lab that's set
> up for all English classes," said Wesley D. Bruce, Indiana's director of school
>
> assessment. "You need a two-week window to test every 11th grader. So you're
> throwing 9th, 10th and 12th graders out of lab time."
>
> Technical glitches are another hurdle. During a trial run, an Internet
> configuration error prevented students at one school from submitting their
> completed essays for grading.
>
> While pleased to be in the vanguard of a technology that could transform essay
> grading nationwide, state education officials are mindful of the risks. "With
> paper and pencil we've spent decades figuring out what's going to go wrong and
> how to deal with it," Mr. Bruce said. "With online we just don't know where all
>
> the problems are."
>
> "We hope we're on the leading edge and not the bleeding edge," he said warily.
>
> _____________________________________
> Tosh Tachino, M.A., B.A. Honors
> Ph.D. Student, Iowa State University
> E-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> http://www.public.iastate.edu/~tosh/
>
>                 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>   To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
>   [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
>          write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]
>
> For the list archives and information about the organization,
>     its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
>               http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
>                  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

                -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
  [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
         write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]

For the list archives and information about the organization,
    its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
              http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
                 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager