LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L Archives

CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L  January 2005

CASLL-L January 2005

Subject:

Re: Evaluation of services offered by writing centres

From:

Margaret Procter <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:40:12 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (151 lines)

Another good question, Emmy, and thanks to Ginny for a fine description of the
uses and limitations of immediate informal responses.

Recently the various writing centres at U of T have moved in two ways to
strengthen the validity of our feedback. First, we got together and agreed on a
common form using a shared structure but with variability in questions. It was
set up using the same 7-point rating scale as used in course evaluations, and
(with some local diffulties) writing directors managed to find ways of
maintaining confidentiality in collecting and processing the forms -- usually
involving a locked box and a secretary. To combine the advantages of the
immediate comments and the official type, some writing centres hand out this
form on a regular basis and the directors process it for "formative" feedback to
instructors; then they hand it out on a confidential basis for a specified
period, perhaps a month at the end of the year. This method has provided useful
data for writing instructors to use in annual performance reviews and promotion
reviews.

It's certainly harder to evaluate the institutional impact of writing centres,
but we have had good results here in several instances by applying the methods
used to evaluate academic programs of the "regular" type. In one internal
review, for instance, committee members from inside and outside the writing
centre looked at the student evals as a group, read the director's reports on
usage rate and the outline of other "outreach" activities, then interviewed a
selection of students and departmental faculty. This was a fairly
impressionistic qualitative review, but it satisfied the immediate need to show
what the writing centre was contributing to the college.

A few years later, the seven college principals commissioned one of their number
to analyse and evaluate the function of all of their writing centres in a report
to the Dean, who was wondering why they spent all that money on them. That study
resulted in a solid 65-page report outlining the theory and history of writing
centres in general and at U of T, and then describing the work and giving usage
figures for each of the college writing centres. That formed the basis of a
request for equalization funding from the Dean (they got it) and I think
contributed to renewed respect for what college writing centres do within the
Faculty of Arts and Science as a whole.

Most recently we have seen excellent results from a full external review of the
newest program here, one set up for graduate students and funded as a pilot
program by central administration. As with departmentalr reviews, one expert
from outside the university and one from inside sat down for two or three days
and went through a binder-full of data and analysis from the program's director,
examined the course structure and descriptions, and interviewed program faculty,
students, and faculty from other departments. Their report gave a rave review to
Jane Freeman and her work, and led to base funding of the program and
confirmation of two new positions, not to mention excellent publicity for the
program. This was a huge amount of work for all concerned, but did indicate that
the program deserved to be taken seriously.

Emmy, I don't know whether your President would be willing to undertake such a
review, but he might consider it if you suggested it. I believe the academic
writing centre at York had such a review a few years ago, conducted by Anthony
Pare. Perhaps someone at York can confirm.

You will note that the models above all pertain to the teaching functions of
writing centres, not just to their "service" elements. Talking in those terms
might be one more way to show that that's how you see your work.

All the best,

Margaret Procter
University of Toront Coordinator, Writing Support
[log in to unmask]
www.utoronto.ca/writing



emisser wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have been asked to look into ways of evaluating the one-on-one
> appointments we offer for students at Laurier's Writing Centre. This request
> has come from the university president who appears to want student
> evaluations of writing centre appointments in place before committing to a
> planned increase in funding for the Writing Centre. Improved funding is good
> news, of course, but before I proceed, I would very much welcome input and
> advice from people on the listserv.
>
>
>
> If you have a moment, I would love to have your response to some of the
> questions below, or comments of any kind that you think useful:
>
>
>
> If you do evaluations at your writing centre, please tell me about
> experience?
>
> If you don't do evaluations, what is your reason?
>
> Which questions to you ask and which ones do you avoid asking?
>
> How do you gather the evaluations?
>
> How do you analyze the results?
>
> To whom do you report the results and how are they used?
>
> What are the pitfalls?
>
>
>
> If you have any questionnaires you are willing to share, I would be very
> grateful.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for doing this.
>
>
>
> Emmy
>
>
>
> Emmy Misser, MA
>
> Writing Centre Co-ordinator
>
> Wilfrid Laurier University
>
> Phone: (519) 884-0710, Ext. 3339
>
> Fax: (519) 746-2472
>
> Web Site: http://www.wlu.ca/writing
>
>
>
>
>                 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>   To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
>   [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
>          write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]
>
> For the list archives and information about the organization,
>     its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
>               http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
>                  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

                -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
  [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
         write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]

For the list archives and information about the organization,
    its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
              http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
                 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager