LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for REED-L Archives


REED-L Archives

REED-L Archives


REED-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

REED-L Home

REED-L Home

REED-L  April 1993

REED-L April 1993

Subject:

New Electronic Text Society

From:

"Hoyt N. Duggan" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Hoyt N. Duggan

Date:

Wed, 14 Apr 1993 14:31:20 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (229 lines)

      SOCIETY FOR EARLY ENGLISH AND NORSE ELECTRONIC TEXTS
 
     We announce with this notice, which we are sending to
several related lists, the formation of a new scholarly organiza-
tion, The Society for Early English and Norse Electronic Texts
(SEENET).  SEENET will procure, produce, and disseminate scholar-
ly electronic editions of Old Norse, Old English and Middle
English texts.  We will combine the full capacities of computer
technology with the highest standards of traditional scholarly
editing to publish machine-readable texts with reliable introduc-
tory materials, annotations, and apparatus.  Texts will conform
to the Text Encoding Initiative's (TEI) guidelines for markup in
the Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) format.
 
     An electronic text offers unprecedented advantages to
historians, literary critics, linguists, and editors.  Unlike
earlier, printed critical texts, the electronic text permits
manipulations of individual manuscripts, archetypes, and critical
texts as well as combinations of each.  Such texts lend them-
selves to sophisticated searches, concordancing, collations, and
other forms of text retrieval.  Editors may present in full both
"good" and "bad" manuscripts, permitting literary historians to
study the history of the reception of the text as shown by
scribal changes or marginal annotations.  Historical linguists
may study developments in the history of the language through
access to large databases of scribal spellings in all the dia-
lects and time periods reflected in many different textual
traditions.  Scholars interested in stylistic analysis are able
to make fuller and more complete studies of metrical, lexical, or
syntactic patterning than are possible with printed texts.
Moreover, the extremely flexible nature of an electronic text is
ideal for representing complex textual traditions, even of works
like Piers Plowman, where editors confront high degrees of ambi-
guity and uncertainty.  Electronic editions will accommodate
scholars who prefer "best text" documentary editions as well as
those who want the best possible modern editorial reconstruc-
tions.
 
     Questions of the accessibility and quality of electronic
texts are, therefore, a matter of current concern to a scholarly
community increasingly enabled by electronic media.  We are all
aware that the limitations imposed by the printed codex need no
longer constrain our historical, cultural, linguistic, or textual
scholarship.  Nevertheless, the institutional means for producing
and disseminating reliable electronic texts are at present
haphazard and inadequate.  Scholars familiar with the Oxford Text
Archive or with the Anglo-Saxon corpus know only too well how
various is the quality of texts in those useful collections.
Meanwhile, novice editors enthusiastic about computing are
adapting older printed editions for more or less elaborate forms
of textual manipulation.  Unhappily, such editions are more often
selected for the single reason that they are out of copyright
than for the quality of their texts.  Furthermore, large and
extremely costly commercial projects such as the Chadwyck-Healey
version of the Patrologia Latina or their similar corpus of
English poetry have become means of disseminating older, obsolete
editions.  Such collections are too immediately useful to be dis-
missed in spite of the uneven quality of the texts thus made
available, but scholars are coming to associate electronic texts
with poor editions.  If the full potential of computer technology
is to be realized by scholars in the humanities, our first and
most important task will be to make available reliable scholarly
editions, texts that are as sophisticated in their linguistic,
paleographic, codicological, historical dimensions as they are in
their computer technology.
 
 
PUBLICATIONS
 
     Our Editorial Board will solicit, evaluate, select, and
oversee scholarly editions for publication in three series.
 
     SERIES A will consist primarily of book-length editions
     published on floppy disks (usually under five mega-
     bytes).  For this series we will publish both diplomat-
     ic transcriptions of manuscript texts and critical
     texts, or combinations of the two.  Texts will be
     accompanied by an introduction as well as appropriate
     historical, paleographic, codicological, lexical, and
     interpretative annotations.
 
     SERIES B will consist of culturally important works
     with complex textual or critical traditions.  Texts in
     this series will accommodate some or all of the follow-
     ing features:
          (a)  digitized facsimiles of some or all manuscripts,
          (b)  diplomatic transcriptions of each manuscript with
               appropriate annotation,
          (c)  a reconstructed archetype with annotation,
          (d)  an edited text with annotations (perhaps incor-
               porating critical comments of previous editors),
          (e)  a display of collated variants,
          (f)  lemmatized concordances of each manuscript, the
               archetype, and the critical text,
          (g)  critical introduction, and
          (h)  a glossary.
     Texts in Series B will be published on CD-ROM disks or tape.
 
     SERIES C will serve an interim function by publishing
     electronic versions of useful older editions with SGML
     markup, until such time as the works may be re-edited.
     One example might be an electronic version of Finnur
     Jo'nsson's Den norsk-islandske skjaldedigtning pub-
     lished in 1912-15 with both diplomatic transcriptions
     from single manuscripts (Series A) and heavily edited
     texts of the skaldic corpus (Series B).  An electronic
     text of this outdated printed text would serve until
     SEENET is able to publish new electronic versions of
     the skaldic corpus.
 
STRUCTURE OF THE SOCIETY
 
(a)  The Editorial Board
 
     Peter Baker,  The University of Virginia.
     Hoyt N. Duggan,  The University of Virginia.
     A. S. G. Edwards,  University of Victoria, British
          Columbia
     Anthony Faulkes, The University of Birmingham
     Ralph Hanna III, University of California--River-
          side
     Judith Jesch,  Institute for Medieval Studies,
               University of Nottingham
     John Price-Wilkin, Information Management Coordi-
          nator, Alderman Library, The University of
          Virginia
     Peter Robinson, Computing Service, Oxford University
     Thorlac Turville-Petre, Institute for Medieval
          Studies,  University of Nottingham
 
(b)  The ADVISORY BOARD consists of an international group of
distinguished medievalists who will advise SEENET's Board of Edi-
tors on matters of policy.  The present Advisory Board consists
of the following scholars:
 
     Professors John Alford, Michigan State University; Ste-
     phen Barney, University of California, Irvine; Larry D.
     Benson, Harvard University; John Burrow, Bristol;
     Patrick Conner, West Virginia University; Marilyn
     Deegan, Oxford University; Christine Fell, Institute
     for Medieval Studies, University of Nottingham; Allen
     Frantzen, Loyola University, Chicago; David Greetham,
     Graduate School and University Center, CUNY; Thomas J.
     Heffernan, University of Tennessee; Robert L. Kellogg,
     University of Virginia; Kevin Kiernan, University of
     Kentucky; V.A. Kolve, University of California, Los
     Angeles; Ian Lancashire, University of Toronto; Michael
     Lapidge, Cambridge University; Anne Middleton, Univer-
     sity of California, Berkeley; Alistair Minnis, Univer-
     sity of York; Douglas Moffat, University of Michigan;
     Derek Pearsall, Harvard University; Fred Robinson, Yale
     University; Geoffrey Russom, Brown University; R. A.
     Shoaf, University of Florida, A. C. Spearing, Univer-
     sity of Virginia; and Paul Szarmach, SUNY Binghamton.
 
 
(c)  The Members of the Society
 
     Members will pay an annual fee which will entitle them
     to receive the SEENET Newsletter and one text from
     Series A or C.  Just as with the Early English Text
     Society, members will be able to purchase SEENET's
     other electronic texts at a discounted price, and the
     texts will be available to non-members at a higher
     price.
 
     We are presently seeking the sponsorship of a major
     academic press to publish our three series, and it
     would be helpful in that effort if we can offer pub-
     lishers an idea of the potential membership for the new
     society.  We would like to know what kinds of member-
     ship fees would be acceptable and whether scholars
     would be willing to submit their scholarly electronic
     texts to SEENET for publication.
 
                           Response Form
 
1.  Will you be likely to join SEENET?
 
2.  How much would you be willing to pay per year to be a member
of SEENET and receive one text from Series A or C?  We are
negotiating with publishers, and prices will depend upon costs,
but we expect that annual dues would be under $30.00 US or #15
sterling.
 
3.  Are you interested in texts in Old English?  Old Norse?
Middle English?
 
4.  Characterize briefly the purposes for which you need machine-
readable texts (e.g., lexical, syntactical, metrical, stylistic,
language history, dialectology, other?).
 
5.  Do you have software available to you that will interpret
SGML marked up text?
 
6.  On what platform(s) will you use electronic texts?
     UNIX
     DOS
     MAC
     OS/2
     WINDOWS
     OTHER
 
7.  Should SEENET provide software for concordancing, collating,
searching its texts?
 
8.  Have you produced or have in preparation an electronic text?
Would you consider submitting it for publication?
 
9.  What texts would you most like to see available in electronic
form?
 
We invite comments, criticism, and support from medievalists in
all disciplines.  Responses by e-mail may be directed to
 
          [log in to unmask]   (or) [log in to unmask]
 
or by regular post to either
          Thorlac Turville-Petre
          Department of English
          University of Nottingham
          Nottingham NG7 2RD
          England
 
or
          Hoyt N. Duggan
          Department of English
          The University of Virginia
          Charlottesville, VA 22903.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
January 2024
November 2023
September 2023
August 2023
May 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
October 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
October 2020
June 2020
May 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
March 2019
November 2018
October 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
December 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
March 2017
April 2016
March 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994
December 1993
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
July 1993
June 1993
May 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993
January 1993
December 1992
November 1992
October 1992
September 1992
July 1992
June 1992
May 1992
April 1992
March 1992
February 1992
January 1992
December 1991
November 1991
October 1991
July 1991
May 1991
April 1991
March 1991
February 1991
January 1991
December 1990
November 1990

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager