LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L Archives

CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L  May 1998

CASLL-L May 1998

Subject:

IMMEDIATE ALERT: Stop House passage of (fwd)

From:

Eric Crump <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

CASLL/Inkshed <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 12 May 1998 15:15:09 -0500

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (375 lines)

fyi
--Eric

---------- Forwarded message ----------

Eric, could you post this on the usual comp list-servs? thanks, Gesa

______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
From: Stanton McCandlish <[log in to unmask]>
Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation

                         EFFector Online Newsletter

   Vol. 11, No. 6               May 11, 1998               [log in to unmask]
   A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation     ISSN 1062-9424

  IN THIS ISSUE

     * IMMEDIATE ACTION ALERT, MAY 12 DEADLINE: CONTACT REPRESENTATIVES
       AGAIN TO OPPOSE DATABASE BILL
         1. SUMMARY
         2. IMMEDIATE ACTION TO TAKE
         3. SAMPLE PHONE "SCRIPT" & SAMPLE FAX
         4. BACKGROUND
     * ADMINISTRIVIA

   See http://www.eff.org for more information on EFF activities &
   alerts!
     _________________________________________________________________


  IMMEDIATE ACTION ALERT, MAY 12 DEADLINE

   CONTACT REPRESENTATIVES AGAIN TO OPPOSE DATABASE BILL

            The Electronic Frontier Foundation       May 4, 1998

   Please distribute widely to appropriate forums, no later than May 20,
                                   1998.

  1. SUMMARY

     * Latest News:
       Please call your Representative on Tue. May 12 to oppose
       anti-science, anti-journalism bill H.R. 2652. House "Collections
       of Information Antipiracy" bill, which would create a new property
       right in databases and make criminal many uses of uncopyrightable
       public-domain information without express permission from a
       database supplier, was scheduled to be voted on by the House last
       week. That vote was postponed, and is to take place Tue., May 12.
       Bill is on the fast track in the House and dangerously likely to
       be passed!
     * What You Can Do Now:
       Follow the directions below and call/fax your own Representatives.
       Ask them to oppose creation of copyright-like protections for
       public-domain information that cannot be copyrighted. Explain that
       no new legislation is needed - the database industry is more
       lucrative now than ever - and that this bill harms all citizens'
       fair use rights and undermines scientific and other inquiry, simply
       to give database companies a new "right" to own and control
       information itself.

  2. IMMEDIATE ACTION TO TAKE

   Free speech and fair use supporters are asked to IMMEDIATELY contact
   their own Representatives, as well as House leaders, and ask them to to
   vote against the database bill, H.R. 2652, expected to pass or fail on
   the House floor on May 12, 1998. This contact shouldn't take more than
   TWO MINUTES per office.

   Urge your Representatives to refrain from voting away your right to
   know and use plain facts because some companies demand special
   privileges to control and charge for the use of public-domain
   information.

   Feel free to make use of the sample fax and phone "script" below.

   (We regret that some readers, due to Net-related delays or for other
   reasons, may not receive this alert in time to act. Sometimes Congress
   moves quickly, leaving us with insufficient warning to issue an alert
   early enough for all readers to receive it in time.)

    LOOKING UP YOUR REPRESENTATIVE'S CONTACT INFO

   See EFF's Contacting Congress factsheet at http://www.eff.org/congress
   which provides links to places to look up who your legislator is if
   necessary, and to obtain their phone and fax numbers. Please PHONE
   first, FAX second. Time is short enough that some of the faxes may
   simply not make it in time.
   If you can spare a few extra minutes, try working your way down this
   list of House leadership, as well as contacting your own Rep:


 Party      Last Name, First Name      Voice Phone        Fax
  State/Dist
   -----------------------------------------------------------------
   R GA/06 Gingrich, Newt             1-202-225-4501  1-202-225-4656+
   R TX/26 Armey, Richard             1-202-225-7772  1-202-226-8100+
   D MO/03 Gephardt, Richard          1-202-225-2671  1-202-225-7452+
   R TX/22 DeLay, Tom                 1-202-225-5951  1-202-225-5241
   D MI/10 Bonior, David              1-202-225-2106  1-202-226-1169
   R OH/08 Boehner, John              1-202-225-6205  1-202-225-0704
   R CA/47 Cox, Christopher           1-202-225-5611  1-202-225-9177
   D CA/03 Fazio, Vic                 1-202-225-5716  1-202-225-5141
   D MD/05 Hoyer, Steny               1-202-225-4131  1-202-225-4300

   (+ These are the most important to contact - call/fax them first.)

   House leaders are, respectively: Speaker, Majority Leader, Minority
   Leader, Maj. Whip, Min. Whip, Republican Conference Chair, Rep. Policy
   Committee Chair, Democratic Caucus Chair, Dem. Steering Cmte. Chair

  3. SAMPLE PHONE "SCRIPT" & SAMPLE FAX

   If you would like to both call, and send a fax, this extra action
   would certainly help.

   For best results, try to put this in your own (short!) words, and be
   calmly emotive without being hostile.

   IF YOU ARE A CONSTITUENT (i.e., you live in the same district as the
   Rep. you are contacting) make sure to say so. For example "I am a
   constituent, and I'm calling/writing because...."

   IF YOU REPRESENT A COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION, say so: "I'm Jane Person
   from Personal Technologies Inc. of Austin. I'm calling on behalf of
   Personal Technologies to ask the Representative to...." Business
   interests carry a lot of weight with many legislators, especially if
   they are in the legislator's home district. Legislators also generally
   heed organizational voices over individiual ones. On this issue
   especially, legislators needs to hear a commercial viewpoint OPPOSING
   this bill.

    PHONE "SCRIPT"

     You: [ring ring]

     Legislative staffer: Hello, Representative Lastname's office.

     You: I'm calling to urge Representative Lastname to REJECT the
     so-called "Collections of Information Antipiracy Act", H.R. 2652.
     This bill is missing key definitions and creates new property rights
     in databases and the raw data contained in them, at the expense of
     ALL citizens' rights to know and use plain facts and information.
     This bill threatens fair use and freedom of speech and press. The
     database industry has not proven any need for this legislation, and
     it is simply yet another attempt to extend copyright-like protection
     to public-domain material that can't be copyrighted. The bill is not
     responsive to WIPO treaty language and it provides for excessive and
     injust penalties. There is no need for this legislation, and I urge
     Representative Lastname to REJECT H.R. 2652. Thank you.

     Staffer: OK, thanks. [click]

   It's that easy.

   You can optionally ask to speak to the legislator's technology &
   intellectual property staffer. You probably won't get to, but the
   message may have more weight if you succeed. The staffer who first
   answers the phone probably won't be the tech/i.p. staffer.

    SAMPLE FAX

   See above for how to get relevant Congressional fax numbers. Please,
   if you have the time, write your own 1-3 paragraph letter in your own
   words, rather than send a copy of this sample letter. (However,
   sending a copy of the sample letter is far better than taking no
   action!)

     Dear Rep. Lastname:

     I'm writing to urge you to reject the excessive intellectual
     property protections for database maintainers as contained in H.R.
     2652, the "Collections of Information Antipiracy Act." This bill,
     while being touted as as a piece of antipiracy legislation,
     actually makes most uses of pure information contained in a
     database illegal without prior permission from the database
     maintainer. The Act does not create useful exceptions for the fair
     use of information, and key definitions of crucial terms, such as
     "collection" and "substantial part" are missing. Furthermore the
     penalties called for - up to $500,000 and 10 years in prison - are
     excessive and injust.

     The database industry is booming and is quite lucrative for
     companies collecting and disseminating information. At present, the
     law requires database collectors to add some originality to the
     information collected before the collectors receive a legally
     recognized property right in the database. H.R. 2652 would change
     this, giving collectors property rights in raw information that has
     traditionally and properly been in the public domain. This assault
     on the public's fair use rights and freedom of speech and press
     will have dire consequences for science, medicine, journalism,
     political campaigning, and legal research. Additionally, the bill
     is simply not responsive in any way to the requirements of recent
     WIPO treaties. WIPO rejected such a "database giveaway".

     The database industry has not demonstrated a clear need for this
     legislation, and the public interest is harmed by giving these
     companies additional rights to control plain facts and information.
     H.R. 2652 represents an attempt by some information collection
     owners to fortify their markets through manipulating the legal
     system (instead of through fair competition and the addition of
     value) by raising fears of electronic piracy of information over
     the Internet and through new information technologies. Congress
     should wait until specific and definable market failures become
     apparent before acting to correct them, and even then not in a way
     as broad and vague as that attempted in H.R. 2652.

     Sincerely,
     My Name Here
     My Address Here

   (Address is especially important if you want your letter to be taken
   as a letter from an actual constituent.)

   For brief tips on writing letters to Congress, see:
   http://www.vote-smart.org/contact/contact.html The most important tip
   is to BE POLITE AND BRIEF. Swearing will NOT help.

   Note for non-US activists: You may wish to contact the House
   leadership listed above, but focus on the argument that WIPO rejected
   the approach taken by this bill because it was highly controversial.
   Perhaps suggests that passage of this bill will simply undo WIPO
   efforts to synchronize intellectual property law around the world, and
   further harm trade between the US and the EU (and other areas.) Avoid
   the argument that non-US interests, especially commercial interests,
   need access to information in American-owned databases (unless you are
   writing to describe a situation in which US interests are thwarted
   because your company or organization will be harmed by the bill, and
   you are working with US companies in some kind of joint effort). US
   legislators see the US as an intellectual property leader, in
   competition with the globe, and would probably like the idea that US
   monetary interests are boosted at the expense of foreigners.

  4. BACKGROUND

    THE LATEST NEWS

   H.R. 2652, the "Collections of Information Antipiracy Act", introduced
   by Rep. Howard Coble (R-NC), expands the rights of database creators
   and maintainers, at the expense of YOUR rights to know and use plain
   and available facts and information. The bill has been put on the fast
   track, and is up for a "suspension rules" vote, by the entire House in
   which it cannot be amendmed to fix its flaws (but can only pass with a
   2/3 majority vote.) An exception is that the principal sponsor can
   amend it at will (probably not for the better). A lot of big money is
   behind this legislation, so the danger of its passage is high. Concerns
   that it would undermine science were enough to get the vote postponed
   last week, but this argument seems to have been insufficient to kill
   the bill. Congress needs to hear from YOU, and especially needs to hear
   from US companies that would be harmed by this legislation.

   The bill, the latest in a long series of efforts by certain commercial
   interests to extend copyright-like protections to that which belongs
   to the public and cannot be copyrighted, authorizes enormous civil and
   criminal penalties (up to $250,000 and/or 5 years in prison for a
   first offense; $500,000 and/or 10 years in prison for subsequent
   convictions!) against anyone who uses uncopyrightable, public domain
   data collected in a database without the express consent of the
   company that controls that database.

   The Act, backed by major database maintainers such as Microsoft, Reed
   Elsevier, and West Publishing, is designed to create a new crime
   against those who extract or commercially use a "substantial part" of
   a collection of information gathered, organized or maintained by
   another person "through a substantial investment of money or other
   resources" so as to harm the data collector's "actual or potential"
   market for a product or service that incorporates that collection of
   information.

   The main problem with the bill is that key terms are either not
   defined or are poorly defined, leaving huge loopholes that render
   literally all information, data, and facts vulnerable under the Act.
   For example, even though the bill is titled the "Collections of
   Information Antipiracy Act," the term "collection" is not defined.
   "Substantial part" is not defined. The terminology is vague enough
   that just about anything could be considered a "substantial part" (cf.
   court decisions regarding digital sampling of one song for sound
   effects in another; generally if the sound bite is recognizable at all
   it is considered "substantial" and still owned by the original
   creator. It is unlikely that we can rely on the courts to narrowly
   interpret this legislation should it pass.)

   And "information" is defined as "facts, data, works of authorship, or
   any other intangible material capable of being collected and organized
   in a systematic way," an extremely broad definition that could include
   just about anything! The legislation amounts to a roundabout form of
   censorship that could severely harm journalism, medicine, scientific
   inquiry, academia, consumer watchdogging, the Freedom of Information
   Act, the democratic political process itself, and many other areas and
   avenues of inquiry about, and/or use of, raw information and facts.

   Unfortunately, while Congress has been feeling intensifying pressure
   from the database maintainers to pass this legislation, they have not
   been hearing from those opposed to the bill. YOUR immediate action is
   needed to stop it from passing the House.

     _________________________________________________________________

ADMINISTRIVIA

   EFFector is published by:

   The Electronic Frontier Foundation
   1550 Bryant St., Suite 725
   San Francisco CA 94103 USA
   +1 415 436 9333 (voice)
   +1 415 436 9993 (fax)

   Editor: Stanton McCandlish, Program Director/Webmaster ([log in to unmask])

   Membership & donations: [log in to unmask]
   Legal services: [log in to unmask]
   General EFF, legal, policy or online resources queries: [log in to unmask]

   Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is encouraged.
   Signed articles do not necessarily represent the views of EFF. To
   reproduce signed articles individually, please contact the authors for
   their express permission. Press releases and EFF announcements may be
   reproduced individually at will.

   To subscribe to EFFector via email, send message body of:
   subscribe effector-online
   to [log in to unmask], which will add you to a subscription list for
   EFFector. To unsubscribe, send a similar message body, like so:
   unsubscribe effector-online

   Please tell [log in to unmask] to manually remove you from the list if this
   does not work for some reason.

   Back issues are available at:
   http://www.eff.org/pub/EFF/Newsletters/EFFector

   To get the latest issue, send any message to
   [log in to unmask] (or [log in to unmask]), and it will be mailed to
   you automagically. You can also get:
   http://www.eff.org/pub/EFF/Newsletters/EFFector/current.html



--------------10B37126593E--



The following is an attached File item from cc:Mail.  It contains
information that had to be encoded to ensure successful transmission
through various mail systems.  To decode the file use the UUDECODE
program.
--------------------------------- Cut Here ---------------------------------
begin 644 rfc822.txt
M4F5C96EV960Z(&)Y(&-C;6%I;"!F<F]M(&YS,2YA;&%W87-H+F]R9PT*1G)O
M;2!S<W1E96QE0&5F9BYO<F<-"E@M16YV96QO<&4M1G)O;3H@<W-T965L94!E
M9F8N;W)G#0I296-E:79E9#H@9G)O;2!L:7-T<V5R=BYA;&%W87-H+F]R9R`H
M;&ES='-E<G8N86QA=V%S:"YO<F<@6S,X+C(Q.2XQ,S(N,C(R72D@8GD@;G,Q
M+F%L87=A<V@N;W)G("@X+C<N-2\X+C<N,RD@=VET:"!%4TU44"!I9"!.04$P
M.3(Q,CL@5'5E+"`Q,B!-87D@,3DY."`Q,SHT-3HQ-B!'350-"E)E8V5I=F5D
M.B!F<F]M($%,05]$0U]#3TU-+U-P;V]L1&ER(&)Y(&QI<W1S97)V+F%L87=A
M<V@N;W)G("A-97)C=7)Y(#$N,C$I.PT*("`@(#$R($UA>2`Y."`P.3HT-CHT
M,B!%4U0-"E)E8V5I=F5D.B!F<F]M(%-P;V]L1&ER(&)Y($%,05]$0U]#3TU-
M("A-97)C=7)Y(#$N,C$I.R`Q,[log in to unmask]@@,#DZ-#8Z,S<@15-4#0I&<F]M
M.B!3:&%R:2!3=&5E;&4@/'-S=&5E;&5`969F+F]R9SX-"E1O.B`B1&EG:71A
M;"!&=71U<F4@0V]A;&ET:6]N($1I<V-U<W-I;VX@3&ES="(@/&1F8VQI<W1`
M;&ES='-E<G8N86QA=V%S:"YO<F<^#0I3=6)J96-T.B!;1G=D.B!%1D9E8W1O
M<B`Q,2XP-CH@24U-141)051%($%,15)4.B!3=&]P($AO=7-E('!A<W-A9V4@
M;V8@9&%T86)A#0I$871E.B!4=64L(#$R($UA>2`Q.3DX(#`Y.C0S.C$W("TP
M-#`P#0I%<G)O<G,M=&\Z(#QT:D!A;&%W87-H+F]R9SX-"E-E;F1E<CH@;&ES
M='!R;V-`;&ES='-E<G8N86QA=V%S:"YO<F<-"E@M;&ES=&YA;64Z(#QD9F-L
M:7-T0&QI<W1S97)V+F%L87=A<V@N;W)G/@T*3W)G86YI>F%T:6]N.B!%;&5C
M=')O;FEC($9R;VYT:65R($9O=6YD871I;VX-"E@M36%I;&5R.B!-;WII;&QA
M(#(N,#%+250@*%=I;CDU.R!5*2`H=FEA($UE<F-U<GD@3513('8Q+C(Q*0T*
M34E-12U697)S:6]N.B`Q+C`-"D-O;G1E;G0M5'EP93H@;75L=&EP87)T+VUI
M>&5D.R!B;W5N9&%R>3TB+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM,3!",S<Q,C8U.3-%(@T*365S
L<V%G92U)1#H@/#-$-T%"0C<V.35`;&ES='-E<G8N86QA=V%S:"YO<F<^#0H`

end

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager