LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for REED-L Archives


REED-L Archives

REED-L Archives


REED-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

REED-L Home

REED-L Home

REED-L  December 1998

REED-L December 1998

Subject:

fwd--Bad Writing Awards (fwd)

From:

Abigail Ann Young <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

REED-L: Records of Early English Drama Discussion

Date:

Tue, 22 Dec 1998 08:27:35 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (193 lines)

**********************Forwarded Message*******************

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Philosophy and Literature announces
Winners of the Fourth Bad Writing Contest (1998)

Full text at:

http://www.cybereditions.com/aldaily


We are pleased to announce winners of the fourth Bad=20
Writing Contest, sponsored by the scholarly journal=20
Philosophy and Literature.

The Bad Writing Contest celebrates the most stylistically=20
lamentable passages found in scholarly books and articles=20
published in the last few years. Ordinary journalism,=20
fiction, departmental memos, etc. are not eligible, nor are=20
parodies: entries must be non-ironic, from serious,=20
published academic journals or books. Deliberate=20
parody cannot be allowed in a field where unintended=20
self-parody is so widespread.

Two of the most popular and influential literary scholars=20
in the U.S. are among those who wrote winning entries in=20
the latest contest.

Judith Butler, a Guggenheim Fellowship-winning professor of=20
rhetoric and comparative literature at the University of=20
California at Berkeley, admired as perhaps "one of the ten=20
smartest people on the planet," wrote the sentence that=20
captured the contest's first prize. Homi K. Bhabha, a=20
leading voice in the fashionable academic field=20
of postcolonial studies, produced the second-prize winner.

"As usual," commented Denis Dutton, editor of Philosophy=20
and Literature, "this year's winners were produced by=20
well-known, highly-paid experts who have no doubt labored=20
for years to write like this. That these scholars must know=20
what they are doing is indicated by the fact that the=20
winning entries were all published by distinguished presses=20
and academic journals."

Professor Butler's first-prize sentence appears in "Further
Reflections on the Conversations of Our Time," an article=20
in the scholarly journal Diacritics (1997):


The move from a structuralist account in which capital is=20
understood to structure social relations in relatively=20
homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power=20
relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and=20
rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the=20
thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form=20
of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as=20
theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the=20
contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed=20
conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent=20
sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.


Dutton remarked that "it's possibly the anxiety-inducing=20
obscurity of such writing that has led Professor Warren=20
Hedges of Southern Oregon University to praise Judith=20
Butler as `probably one of the ten smartest people on the=20
planet'."

This year's second prize went to a sentence authored by=20
Homi K. Bhabha, a professor of English at the University of=20
Chicago. He writes in The Location of Culture (Routledge,=20
1994):


If, for a while, the ruse of desire is calculable for the=20
uses of discipline soon the repetition of guilt,=20
justification, pseudo-scientific theories, superstition,=20
spurious authorities, and classifications can be seen as=20
the desperate effort to "normalize" formally the=20
disturbance of a discourse of splitting that violates=20
the rational, enlightened claims of its enunciatory=20
modality.


This prize-winning entry was nominated by John D. Peters of=20
the University of Iowa, who describes it as "quite=20
splendid: enunciatory modality, indeed!"

Ed Lilley, an art historian at the University of Bristol in=20
the U.K., supplied a sentence by Steven Z. Levine from an=20
anthology entitled Twelve Views of Manet's "Bar" (Princeton=20
University Press, 1996):


As my story is an august tale of fathers and sons, real and=20
imagined, the biography here will fitfully attend to the=20
putative traces in Manet's work of "les noms du p=E8re," a=20
Lacanian romance of the errant paternal phallus ("Les=20
Non-dupes errent"), a revised Freudian novella of the=20
inferential dynamic of paternity which annihilates (and=20
hence enculturates) through the deferred introduction of=20
the third term of insemination the phenomenologically=20
irreducible dyad of the mother and child.


Stewart Unwin of the National Library of Australia passed=20
along this gem from the Australasian Journal of American=20
Studies (December 1997). The author is Timothy W. Luke, and=20
the article is entitled, "Museum Pieces: Politics and=20
Knowledge at the American Museum of Natural History":


Natural history museums, like the American Museum,=20
constitute one decisive means for power to de-privatize and=20
re-publicize, if only ever so slightly, the realms of death=20
by putting dead remains into public service as social=20
tokens of collective life, rereading dead fossils as=20
chronicles of life's everlasting quest for survival,=20
and canonizing now dead individuals as nomological emblems=20
of still living collectives in Nature and History. An=20
anatomo-politics of human and non-human bodies is sustained=20
by accumulating and classifying such necroliths in the=20
museum's observational/expositional performances.


The passage goes on to explain that museum fossils and=20
artifacts are "strange superconductive conduits, carrying=20
the vital elan of contemporary biopower." It's demonstrated=20
with helpful quotations from Michel Foucault's History of=20
Sexuality.

Finally, a tour de force from a 1996 book published by the=20
State University of New York Press. It was located by M.J.=20
Devaney, an editor at the University of Nebraska Press. The=20
author is D.G. Leahy, writing in Foundation: Matter the=20
Body Itself.


Total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the=20
exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which=20
it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside,=20
while the equivocal predication of the outside of the=20
absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality=20
so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of=20
the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute=20
identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal=20
predication of identity is possible of the self-identity=20
which is not identity, while identity is univocally=20
predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of=20
the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of=20
the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely=20
unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the=20
dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the=20
shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of=20
the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other=20
of self-identity: existence univocally predicated of the=20
absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The precision=20
of the shining of the light breaking the dark is=20
the other-identity of the light. The precision of the=20
absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light=20
itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of=20
existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity=20
of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans=20
depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself=20
univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity=20
itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in=20
"self-alienation," not "self-identity, itself in=20
self-alienation" "released" in and by "otherness," and=20
"actual other," "itself," not the abysmal inversion of the=20
light, the reality of the darkness equivocally,=20
absolute identity equivocally predicated of the=20
self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the=20
reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of=20
identity which is the identification person-self).


Dr. Devaney calls this book "absolutely, unequivocally
incomprehensible." While she has supplied further extended=20
quotations to prove her point, this seems to be enough.

************************************************

The next round of the Bad Writing Contest, results to be=20
announced at the end of 1999, is now open. There is an=20
endless ocean of pretentious, turgid academic prose being=20
added to daily, and we'll continue to honor it.

Prof. Denis Dutton
Editor, Philosophy and Literature University of Canterbury,=20
Christchurch, New Zealand

Phone: 011-643-348-7928
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
January 2024
November 2023
September 2023
August 2023
May 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
October 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
October 2020
June 2020
May 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
March 2019
November 2018
October 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
December 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
March 2017
April 2016
March 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994
December 1993
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
July 1993
June 1993
May 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993
January 1993
December 1992
November 1992
October 1992
September 1992
July 1992
June 1992
May 1992
April 1992
March 1992
February 1992
January 1992
December 1991
November 1991
October 1991
July 1991
May 1991
April 1991
March 1991
February 1991
January 1991
December 1990
November 1990

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager