 |
 |
Dear Murph, Excuuuuuuuuuuuse me! I wan't the one who posted a private email. Besides, you misinterpreted the message. It was a sarcastic comment regarding myself, not a personal attack on you. You need to open your mind and let the sun shine in. Greg Murph wrote: > Open letter to Greg Sterling: > You and I have opinions that are completely different. We both have a > right to express them and to rebut each other. That said, it does not > give us the right to personally attack each other. On future posts I > would appreciate it if you would limit your arguments to the subject at > hand. Personal attacks have no place on this board > murph brown 57/9 > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:40:54 -0500 Merlin H Brown <[log in to unmask]> > writes: > > I agree with the statement made below by the Gov. of Nebraska. If we > > can obtain the cells for research from sources other than aborted > > babies, I am all for it. Otherwise, I stand in agreement with many > > others who could hardly be classified in the category of "ignorant." > > And just for the record, I am not the one with the PWP. I should > > have signed my name earlier -- this is his wife, Bev. > > > > "[Gov.] Johanns said he opposes abortion, and the thought of fetal > > tissue being used for research disturbs him. He said he believes it > > also is disturbing to the majority of Nebraskans. If there is a way > > other than using aborted children to obtain cells for research, that > > option should be evaluated, Johanns said" > > (excerpted from: Fallout is Intense From Nebraska Fetal Tissue > > Research Revelations, Source: December 1, 1999 Omaha World-Herald) > > > > On 19 Jan 00 16:21:35 -0500 [log in to unmask] writes: > > > Can somebody please tell this poor ignorant PWP what a baby in the > > > womb has to do > > > with stem-cell research? > > > > > > Greg > > > > > > > > > >** --------- End Original Message ----------- ** >