 |
 |
James, Because, often the reply makes absolutely NO sense at all if the reader does not know what was replied to. Often the "Subject" is not valid because the "thread" of the messages has gotten tangled in the reply process. If the entire message is not necessary ---- forward only the portion that is pertinent to the reply. Not sending a copy of at least at portion of the message makes many of the replies the equivalent of junk mail if the reader missed the original posting. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: JIM CARTER To: [log in to unmask] Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2000 6:38 PM Subject: RE;ORIGINAL MESS/TO MUCH SPACE TO THE POWERS TO BE AND ANY ONE ELSE I sure this has been talked about but lets do it again I missed it. Why do most people when they reply include the original message? Because of the time and space it takes up is there a good reason to do this other your to dam lazy to start a new message. If your responding to a particular message just refer to it. Now I'm going to go sulk because I can't use Dante the Dragon. SIR JAMES