Print

Print


Hey Brian and Fellow List-family

Don't forget to factor in the difference between taking Sinemet
with a sweet beverage as such as fruit juice or soda pop as
opposed to taking it with water or maybe coffee....

For those who don't know, Sinemet works faster, smoother AND
generally a bit better, with "better" being different in each PWP,
as a rule).

Sooo.... no matter what dosage of Sinemet you're scarfing down
each day, the OUTCOME can be noticeably and fairly consistantly
bettered by WHAT you drink when you take your daily Sinemet.

Another thin gyou might not be aware of is that if you're starting
to go into an "off" mode, you MAY be able to forstall the "off" or
lessen it's immediate impact for a while by eating a few teaspoons
of ice cream or drinking a sweet beverage - even eating a cookie -
'cause apparently sugar or honey is a "Sinemet booster" or
possibly a buffer.

This "sweet phenomana" isn't just a figment of imagination for a
few "On the fringe crackpots" (NOT that any of YOU are an "on the
fringe crackpot!! <wee smirk>.  Rather, it's a bona fide benefit
that many Parkies AND physicians stumble on (Heck - many of US
stumble at the drop of a hat as it is!) <GROAN>
by accident.

Barb Mallut
[log in to unmask]

al Message-----
From: Brian Collins <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: Sinemet


>On Tue 25 Jan, William A. Parrette wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>         On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, the digest contained:
>>
>> > ...
>> > Date:    Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:01:27 -0500
>> > From:    "Hawkins, Darwin"
<[log in to unmask]>
>> > Subject: Re: Sinemet
>> >
>> > Would taking one 25/100 every 3 hours be closer to
approximating the desired
>> > effect of one 50/200 every 6 hours? Seems to me it would
smooth things out.
>> > ...
>>
>>         First, let me say (as has been said before) everybody's
physi-
>>      ology is different and different medications rarely have
the same
>>      effect on two different people.  This is especially true
with PW-
>>      Ps and Sinemet.
>>
>>         That being said:
>>
>>         25 mg. Carbidopa/100 mg. Levodopa x 8 (every 3 hours) =
>>                               200 mg. Carbidopa/800 mg.
Levodopa a day
>>
>>         50 mg. Carbidopa/200 mg. Levodopa x 4 (every 6 hours) =
>>                               200 mg. Carbidopa/800 mg.
Levodopa a day
>>
>>         And, although apparently the same levels of each
ingredient is
>>      being used, the regular Sinemet delivery would have
"spikes"  in
>>      its  delivery-graph  and effectiveness.  Where the CR
(controlled
>>      release) version's delivery-graph would be smoother.  In
theory,
>>      the  delivery of the CR is spread out more evenly over its
effec-
>>      tive period which results in a more even control of the
tremors;
>>      where  the non-CR version would result in more control
soon after
>>      the dose was taken and less control toward the end of its
effec-
>>      tive period.
>>
>>         If I remember correctly, the delivery-graphs for both
products
>>      are available at:
>>
>>                          http://www.sinemetcr.com/
>>
>>         But, then again, all us PWPs is different ... :-)
>
>
>
>I must write a few words to try and bring a degree of consistency
to the
>discussion about Sinemet tablets, in particular the CR200/50,
CR100/25 and
>plain Sinemet 100/25.
>
>The first thing to understand is that the effective duration of
any of the
>types of tablet mentioned here is totally outside the control of
the PWP.
>
>The effective duration of these tablets is controlled for the
most part by
>the particular characteristics ofthe PWP's digestive system, with
>contributions from the lower intestine, the blood system, and the
>blood/Brain barrier. In addition, a newly-diagnosed PWP will tend
to get
>a longer period of effectiveness than a long-term PWP. As you
will see,
>none of those variables can be altered by us, to suit some drug
schedule
>which we have dreamed-up. I would estimate that at least half the
drug
>schedules that I see fail to recognise this single, fundamental
fact.
>For example; Sinemet 100/25 has (for me) an effective duration of
2 hours.
>If I was told to take one tablet every 4 hours and did so, I
would get
>a situation in which I got the full dose of levodopa over the
first 2
>hours, and then 2 hours of NOTHING until the next tablet is
taken.
>This is just about the worst thing to do to a system trying to
stay 'ON'
>without the worry of dyskinesias: You will get the dyskinesias
during the
>first 2 hours, but suffer from a total 'OFF' during the second 2
hours.
>
>So what can you do? It is quite simple really, you experiment on
yourself.
>Yes, here we go again- it is dangerous to fiddle with your drugs
etc. etc.
>so alright, ask your neuro to administer the tests - you may both
learn
>something. All you want to know is what is your 'Magic Number' -
the time
>interval which, if you take one Sinemet 100/25 at that rate, will
give you
>a constant, uninterrupted flow of effectiveness. Only then, can
you think
>about tailoring the size of the dose.
>
>For the CR tablets, the principle is exactly the same, except
that the
>CR200 (in my tests) had an effective life of 4 hours, giving an
excellent
>50 mg/hour flow rate. When I did these tests (about 7 or 8 years
ago),
>there were no CR100 tablets available from Sinemet. There were
some
>Madopar CR100/25 however, so I tried those and was impressed to
see that
>the CR100 lasted the same time - 4 hours, and at all points
delivered
>exactly half the amounr of levadopa as the Sinemet CR200/50. I
wouldn't be
>at all surprised to find that the new Sinemet CR100/25 was the
same, in
>which case you can simply take two CR100s and get exactly the
same result
>as if you took 1 CR200.
>
>Since that answers the original question, I will stop there.
Further
>reading can be found on  Simon Cole's Web site
>Regards,
>
>     http://james.parkinsons.org.uk/brian.htm
>--
>Brian Collins  <[log in to unmask]>  (59/39/34)