Cari wrote the following...
>>>as we all know - this list often buries incredible gems and >>>words of
wisdom
>>>among much rubbish - therefore, tho' i swore i would >>>"delete" it all,
i just
>>>couldn't - so here i continue to sit - two and 1/2 hours later!
Cari, FWIW, I, too, cannot just delete a msg for fear of losing some "gem"
of information and have spent hours in front of the computer....I finally
decided when I had a large volume of email to read that I would make my
phone calls at the same time that I read the email....the "non-gems" are
deleted as I go through the email and the "gems" are saved until I hang up
the phone and can concentrate on reading them........and then I don't feel
like I've wasted a morning on the computer. Joan Hartman
----- Original Message -----
From: Cari Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 7:17 PM
Subject: PartiallyPD / PartiallyNON -
> to all -
> i've been off-line for about 3 weeks (moved computer from one location to
> another and, 1 day @ a time, took a break away from the computer...)
>
> upon my return today i had 1009 messages to go through - i am now down to
47
> (some read, but not filed - some still waiting to be read...)
>
> as we all know - this list often buries incredible gems and words of
wisdom
> among much rubbish - therefore, tho' i swore i would "delete" it all, i
just
> couldn't - so here i continue to sit - two and 1/2 hours later! just
wanted
> to comment as follows:
>
> SINEMET
> the dialogue regarding sinemet "&/or-vs" CR continues to baffle and
educate
> all at the same time - AND, as the Sinemet-Tasmar ratio continues to be my
> dad's primary obsticle, it has been one which i will review again and
again -
>
> MANNATECH
> several years ago my brother introduced me to it - never heard anything
> anywhere earth-shattering so pursued it no further. . . have yet to hear
from
> truly valid sources of any merit. . .
>
> LURKERS
> so glad to hear from them - how nice to see new names and fresh opinions -
> and for one in particular
> ("...once again sorry for any inconvenience. I shall return to "lurker"
> status which will prevent any future recurrence...")
> PLEASE DON'T GO! MISTAKES ARE ALLOWED!!
>
> OFFLINE EMAILS
> our list moms encourage offline messages as long as they are not of a
> harassing nature, correct? seems like that is something that is either
often
> forgotten or feared if not in agreement...
>
> VES, MARGARET & DON
> how wonderful to see the list functioning in it's full glory - referrals
and
> information flying to and fro to help where help was needed - i hope the
> updates are positive and soon. . .
>
> SOME THINGS NEVER CHANGE. . . !
> - lots of newcomers who "wanted out"
> - attitudes & opinions that bruise, look ugly but then disappear
> - those never-ending unchanged headers! (sure have kept me busy today. . .
!)
>
> anyway - today's been a good day -
>
> cari
> "daughter of. . . "
>
