 |
 |
the idea of cloned was not of a person, but of a cell ability./ thanks for the other infor. Kathie ----- Original Message ----- From: Edward Kleinmeyer <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 6:54 AM Subject: Re: seed cell research controversy > Kathie, My understanding is that this process is not strictly aborted fetus > but umbilical cords etc. Sid can tell you all the sources. Why would you > want to be cloned just to harvest what you already have? Wouldn't it be > murder to harvest from a clone? Just some thoughts. Shirley > -----Original Message----- > From: Kathie J Creveling <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Thursday, February 10, 2000 4:58 AM > Subject: seed cell research controversy > > > >My view is... > >IF WE ARE SO GREAT AT CLONING, WHY USE ABORTED FETUS? IT TAKES UP TO FIVE > >ABORTED FETUS FOR ONE PWP. PLUS, I COULD NEVER FEEL LIKE I WAS BETTER DUE > TO > >FIVE INNOCENT LIVES GONE.