Print

Print


Does the word GREED ring a bell???
-----Original Message-----
From: KEn Becker <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sunday, February 13, 2000 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: Non-PD: Re: Attack of the SLEEP ATTACK


>This is a serious question to ponder: With all the space-age technology
>available, and automobiles being produced about a hundred years, why don't
we
>have cars with auto-pilot features to take over when the driver has lost
>control, for whatever reason, whether a sleep attack, or even a heart
attack?
>AND, I might add, why aren't cars built to withstand collisions with the
>normal inhabitants of the roadway, including other cars, trucks, power
poles,
>trees, etc? They make them smart enough to call an ambulance or a wrecker,
>why not use the technology to AVOID collisions,  and survive the
unavoidable?
>Why is equipment made available that could save lives, and then made an
>option for extra  money?  Some examples: side airbags, anti-lock braking
>systems, daytime running lamps, roll bars, SAFE tires, especially tires
that
>can run after a puncture. Adjustable pedals and seats to suit all size
>drivers. Real bumpers, not styrofoam filled, plastic covered, appendages
that
>crumble from a parking lot bump?  a frame that keeps the car from folding
the
>occupants inside between sharp broken parts, requiring the "Jaws of Life"
to
>extricate them?  Cars now cost what homes once did in the USA, so the
expense
>is not a good enough excuse, and insurance premiums could be reduced if
there
>were fewer injuries and deaths.  So maybe when we take the blame for a
>momentary lapse as a driver, we should shift the blame to the makers of the
>vehicles?  Isn't it obvious that people who can't afford the more expensive
>cars with all the safety features, don't deserve to be maimed or killed for
>the sake of economy?  Police cars are usually heavy duty vehicles with
>maximum safety features, imagine the same accident Greg had with a  typical
>low-end economy sub-compact car!  The car companies have easy access to the
>mortality rates for each make and model,  why don't we? Even a pack of
>cigarettes has a death warning on it, why not the same for cars?  Any
experts
>in the car business out there who can (and will!) answer these questions?
> Ken "Just wondering......"