Print

Print


Greg.Thanks for responding. When the tremors and stiffness are there then
that is an (on )? This Neuro said (you do not have PD) This was after he had
me put my thumb and finger together several times,touch my finger to his
then to my noise. Sent me for blood work of Thyroid and Enemia,both
neg.checked my reflexes with his little hammer.That was about it. When I
tried to pen him down all he said was it's inherited and gave me MYSOLINE 50
mgs. Any thoughts?? Shirley
-----------------------------------------------------
Click here for Free Video!!
http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/

----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Sterling <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: On-Off (Shirley)


> Shirley,
> You ever throw a light switch?  That's what on-off feels like.  At least
for me.  It is not a
> gradual thing.  One minute I can be literally nimble as a gymanst.  The
next slow and
> cumbersome.  It's like a roller-coaster ride all day long.  The worst part
is that your moods
> run the same cycle.
>
> How did your neuro decide you don't have PD?  Did he come up with
something else?
> Do you respond to sinemet?
>
>
> Greg
> 47/35/35
>
> :)
>
>
> > ** Original Subject: Re: Rating scales.  Was: Long term prognosis
> > ** Original Sender: Edward Kleinmeyer <[log in to unmask]>
> > ** Original Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 10:30:30 -0500
>
> > ** Original Message follows...
>
> >
> > I agree with Greg. The mood swings are so bad,but according to this
neuro I
> > have been going to I don't have PD. I don't understand  his thinking. If
a
> > large amount of symptoms are there then what is going on?? Can some one
> > explain (on-off) and is there a certain amount of time or is it
different
> > for everyone? Shirley
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Click here for Free Video!!
> > http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----From: Chris van der Linden
> <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 6:49 AM
> > Subject: Re: Rating scales. Was: Long term prognosis
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > Dear Rita and others,
> > >
> > > As a movement disorder specialist I know the impact on daily living
for
> > > Parkinson patients very well.
> > > However, to use a scale to score this impact is not easy and therefore
> > > conventional scales are used. As a matter of fact the Hoehn and Yahr
scale
> > > and the Schwab and England scale are more than 35 years old and still
> > being
> > > used, which tells you something about the difficulty of creating a
newer
> > > scale.  Scales are usually designed by the physicians for research
> > purposes
> > > and should therefore be very objective.  A scale measuring the impact
on
> > > life has many subjective features and therefore not used by
clinicians.
> > As
> > > a matter of fact they may not even be interested in such a scale. It
would
> > > be wondeful, considering the extensive use of the internet, that
patients
> > > should come up with suggestions to create a scale for themselves to be
> > able
> > > to give other fellow patients an idea on their condition and to have
an
> > idea
> > > of the condition of the person they are "chatting" with.
> > > Anybody interested??
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Dr. Chris van der Linden
> > >
> > >  I think it does prevent all but the "most open minded" neuro's from
> > > > comprehending the impact of the PD on daily/family living.  I have
also
> > > > suggested a questionaire for the Carepartner that could be a
checklist
> > > > completed in the waiting room (most of us have plenty of time
> > > > there!)....which could be helpful in the evaluation/suggestion/
> > > > modification/communication of treatment/medication.
> > > >
> > > > The other thing I notice is that as we "accept" the limitations of
the
> > > > progression of PD, the answers to some of the questions on the UPDRS
> > > improve.
> > > >  What bothered me in the beginning, may seem insignificant now in
the
> > > realm
> > > > of everyday living and frustrations.  Also my "mood" when I am asked
> > these
> > > > questions may vary.........if I am "on", I will answer one
> > way..........if
> > > I
> > > > am "off", I will usually give a more positive answer.  This seems a
bit
> > > > different than one might anticipate....but when I am "off" I do not
want
> > > to
> > > > talk, elaborate, define, think.........so therefore give the answer
that
> > > will
> > > > require the least followup information from me.
> > > >
> > > > So, how do we ever get the medical community to hear our requests
for an
> > > > updated version of an old problem.........?
> > > >
> > > > Rita Weeks 55/10
> > > >
>
>
> >** --------- End Original Message ----------- **
>
> >