The transcript of the show, live feedback, and the hearing transcript--the works--are all at: http://abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/2020_000308_fetalparts_feature.html Fetuses for Sale? Accounts of For-Profit Industry Lead to Federal Investigation Fetal tissue is currently used in research for illnesses like diabetes, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. (ABCNEWS.com) March 8 —Two hours after getting radiation treatment for thyroid cancer, Cindy Smith, 31, found out she was pregnant with twins. Though unsure exactly how the radiation had affected the fetuses, or what sort of impact it would later have on their growth, doctors expected multiple birth defects, at best, if Smith carried them full term. It was a difficult choice for the mother of five who has always wanted twins, but Smith decided to end her pregnancy. She also decided to donate her fetuses for medical research. “I wanted to make something positive out of the horrific situation that I was in,” explains Smith. “I wanted to help another mother, another family…It was the one glimmer of hope that I had.” But a year and a half later, Smith’s hope has turned to shock, disbelief and outrage: The fetuses she donated for scientific research were sold for profit. Horrified by the thought of a price tag on human body parts, Smith is not alone. A thriving industry in which aborted fetuses are being marketed for hundreds, even thousands of dollars, raises uncharted ethical questions and ignites a new argument in the battle over abortion. Supply and Demand “It looks like it has rapidly become a kind of business where people are profiteering and basically making a buck by getting tissue and distributing it,” says Arthur Caplan, director of the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics. “It’s a sleazy business.” When President Clinton lifted a long-standing ban on fetal tissue research in 1993, the tissue became available for potentially lifesaving purposes. Now, fetal tissue is in demand because doctors believe it may be the key to medical breakthroughs, such as cures for diabetes, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Some researchers, for example, use particular fetal cells in their search for cures and improved treatment, others require whole organs or limbs. To prevent the trafficking of body parts, Congress had also passed a law making it a felony to purchase or sell the tissue for profit. Procurement agencies, which collect, preserve and ship the fetuses, may only charge reasonable fees to compensate for their costs. Also, to remove any incentive for a woman to have an abortion, federal law demands a woman’s consent for abortion prior to consent for fetal tissue donation. Finally, there may be no altering in the method of abortion for purposes of getting a better specimen. But there is evidence that companies may be violating the law, by openly trafficking fetal body parts, influencing consent to donate and modifying abortion procedures. And despite the government’s attempts to regulate fetal tissue research, such violations inflame the debate over abortion. People on both sides of the issue may be opposed to fetal trafficking and profiteering, but they also have individual concerns about how the discovery of a for-profit fetal tissue industry may impact their distinct agendas. Pro-lifers argue that a financial incentive could encourage more women to have abortions, and pro-choice advocates fear such evidence could be used to eliminate access to abortion services altogether. Not-So-Big Big Business “This is purely for profit. Everything was about money,” says Dean Alberty, who worked for two companies that served as middlemen by getting fetuses from abortion clinics and shipping them to researchers. Alberty says he helped put together one of the firm’s price list — from $325 for a spinal cord to $999 for a brain — prices, he says, that far exceeded the company’s costs. The companies for which he worked, Alberty claims, even at times told him to take tissue from fetuses that were not intended for research. He also alleges that some women who donated at an early stage of pregnancy were put through longer, more uncomfortable abortions using the syringe method, which yields better tissue than than the typically used suction machine. Alberty, who says he was originally pro-choice, grew so disturbed by what he saw that he contacted Life Dynamics, a Texas pro-choice group that paid him $10,000 to be an informant. Denying that he has made up stories to push a political agenda, Alberty says, “I will stand behind my words until I die. I will go in front of Congress if I have to and testify under oath.” Holding Violators Accountable Rep. Thomas Bliley (R-VA), who chairs the United States House Commerce Committee, says they are now investigating four companies and have found evidence that they may be selling tissue for profit. The House Commerce Health and Environmental Subcommittee will hold a hearing on this issue tomorrow. For Cindy Smith, this action is a step toward justice, but it does not relieve her anger. “I did not donate that thinking ever that someone was going to profit,“ she says, “and that just really bothers me because that’s not what I intended at all.” SEARCH ABCNEWS.com FOR MORE ON … W E B L I N K U.S. House Hearing, Fetal Tissue “It looks like it has become a kind of business where people are profiteering and basically making a buck by getting tissue and distributing it.” — Arthur Caplan, University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Copyright ©2000 ABC News Internet Ventures. Click here for Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and Internet Safety Information applicable to this site. -- Charlotte A. Mancuso *************************************************** For advocacy, medical, and other PD-related material, go to: http://www.onelist.com/subscribe/CurePD-NorCal