 |
 |
hi list.. I have been rather silent recently, but I had to respond to this thread. I don't understand why it makes that much difference whether Michael J Fox begins his own donation fund for pd research or not? I must be missing something that you more enlightened people know. It seems to me that what ever he intends will not hurt; in fact it may help by drawing attention to MJF who has pd and is a house hold name. Isn't that part of the attention we all seek? It doesn't seem helpful to turn on one another if two have differing opinions as I read today. Maybe it is time once more to focus on our shared goals and less on how it is reached ? Differences make all of us stronger and more able to withstand anything as long as we all keep an open mind. *seattle* audrey.. friend of pwp aussie john 48/42/38?? subject: Re: [Re: MICHAEL J FOX] > greg :your statement applies to the business worldd not to the field of > > research., and its a bit of b.s. > > > > > > Greg Sterling <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Competition is the American way. I can think of no better way to approach a > complicated > > problem like PD than to attack it from several different angles. > Singularism breeds > > complacency and inferiority. > > Greg > > 47/35/35 > > > > > > > > > > > At a time when the 3 large PD Organiz. should get together and stop the > > > > > > nonsense of competing, we understand M J Fox intends to start another > > > > > > donation gathering fund. > > > > > > ho hum > > > > > > bk > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at > > http://webmail.netscape.com. > > > > > > >** --------- End Original Message ----------- ** > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com. >