On 25 Apr 2000, at 22:44, William A. Parrette wrote: (in part) > > First, let me say I find your posts always worthwhile ... > > Awww ... gee ... [blush] ... Now I feel like I was fishin' for > a compliment. :-) > > > ... > > If you have a 386 with 8 megs of Ram running Windows 3.1 > > then my personal preferences are Opera for the browser and > > Pegasus for the e-mail. Opera is free to evaluate for 30 days > > and still (in compressed download form) is about 1.5 megs. > > Pegasus is a little larger ... > > Well, I'm kind of heavily invested in UNIX/Pine at my ISP. My > primary consideration for an e-mail client is whether it runs un- > der UNIX, if it allows me to invoke vi (or vim :-) ) to compose > my messages, and if it is available on my ISP's shell server. > > But, I was *very* interested in the Opera browser and, in > fact, went to their Web site that you had mentioned in a previous > post. It looked very interesting. And, when the Mac version be- > comes available, I will definitely look into it further. > > Thanks. > Hey, yer welcome Bill, I looked at Project Magic for the latest update on Opera and found this... Last Update: 25 April 2000! Now Three Macintosh Ports in the Works! http://www.opera.com/alt_os.html#mac Talk about timing! ........... regards .... murray [log in to unmask]