Print

Print


The conclusion of a 5 year Double-blind placebo controlled experiment
has resulted in a tentative conclusion that two plus two equals FOUR.
A spokesman for the Research team said 'The findings should provide a
new insight into the difficult subject of prescribing drugs for the
treatment of Parkinson's Disease'

Procedures; The study was carried out using a team of volunteers
who were all Neurologists between the ages of 25 and 30 years.
Using a double-blind random selection technique they were grouped
in pairs and locked into cages, with two pairs in each cage.

After five years, the subjects were released  and counted. To
the amazement of the Research team, the average number of neurologists
in each cage was Four! ( Eight of the cages contained only three
neurologists, but this was anticipated in the study, knowing how anti-
social some neuros can be. An unexpected result was obtained wherein
six cages were found to contain 5 people in each cage. The spokesman
became rather agitated and refused to discuss this result.

In summary, this new finding will have repercussions whenever
prescriptions are produced, and in future in the manufacture and
packaging of drugs, all of which can be approached confident in the
knowledge that Two plus Two Equals Four. (At a 95% confidence level)

----------------------------------------------------------

No, I haven't flipped just yet: This bit of whimsy was provoked by
the report concerning Ropinerol and Dyskinesia, which must come high
in the list ofstatements of the obvious.

Surely any neurologist worth his salt could ,after about two minutes
of concentrated thought, make a confident and accurate prediction of
the result of this study.

It is obvious that the Ropinerol people are going to work their way
through the age ranges , and the whole Parkinson's Circus (Patients
included) Are going to congratulate them on a splendid piece of work.
I think it is a total wate of money.

I just had a mischeivous thought: I don't see why the other Dopamine
Agonist manufacturers should not read the Ropinerol result across to
their drug, with no further testing...... Any comments?


--
Brian Collins  <[log in to unmask]>  (60/39/34)