At 12:26 AM 2000/05/19 EDT, Mary Manfredi <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Janet , >We, who are not so savvy at digging up the nitty=gritty news, >do appreciate your efforts on our behalf. >Nice selection ... >mm > thank you mary i thought it was interesting that this time, after struggling with the 'new and improved' PubMed website, i have finally conceded defeat in my desire to post all the pubmed abstracts about pd 163 in thirty days is becoming the normal 'barometer' reading there! [of pd abstracts accepted by PubMed in the last 30 days] three years ago it was only 20 or 30! so as soon as i decided that posting the summary of same would be the only realistic way to get any mention of all this research into our list archives, lo and behold, i 'chanced' upon a simple-to-download text version of what i had been arguing with for a month! when will i learn that these 'smacks upside my head' are simply ways and means of grabbing my attention??!!?? i.e no, not that way! hey, i said not that way! giannetta who sometimes knows that nothing is left to chance and who sometimes forgets janet paterson 53 now / 41 dx / 37 onset 613 256 8340 / PO Box 171 Almonte Ontario K0A 1A0 Canada visit my website "a new voice" at: http://www.geocities.com/janet313/