 |
 |
Hi Alf I have some experience of NADH, and would recommend the book by Lucille & Geoffrey Leader " Parkinson's Disease and the new nutrition", which gives a very good rationale about NADH and PD. I used NADH for two years, taken both orally and intravenously (IV). For me, it did not work - but others, especially those using it as IV treatment, have praised the effectiveness of the treatment. I offer this as some guidance only - I found the pills very hard to get along with, however, the sub - lingual format was initially more beneficial for me. I had a course of IV treatment with NADH for 10 days in Austria last October - the "jury is still out" on the benefits - cost versus effectiveness. If the treatment were to be offered in the UK, then I would give it another go. I hope this is of some help. For my own preference, acupuncture (weekly), nutritional support and diet keep me on the road - I still manage to play regular tennis and golf after 4 years with PD. Here are a couple of web links, reference NADH: Best wishes Tony -----Original Message----- From: Parkinson's Information Exchange Network [mailto]On Behalf Of Alf Cousins Sent: 06 July 2000 08:49 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: ENADA (nadh) This substance has received some good press in thr UK lately, implying it is very beneficial fo treating PD. It isn't avaliable in Asutralia (the real land of Oz). Web searches have turned up mostly old research reports (circa 93) or more recent requotes of the same. Before getting excited about this 'miracle cure' can anyone tell me if there are recent (last two years) substantive vindications of the efficacy of ENADA. More, many of the articles quote that "over 3000 cases of PD are being treated in Europe using nadh", can anyone point to any instance of validated reports of this. Who is doing the treatment, where and with what results? I'd like to get to the truth before firing up the hopes of an otherwise unsuspecting Ozzie public. Alf