 |
 |
Denny Your position is very well stated. We may need to deal with some political realities, but it is highly unlikely that one or the other candidate/party will make a major difference. It is our focus that is important, regardless of who wins the election. Nothing can be allowed to set us back 20 years, 2 years, 2 months, or 2 weeks. We are in a battle that must be won, and gaining bipartisan support of our cause makes much more sense than aligning with either major political party. Dave Bergford 59/58/55? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Nestler" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2000 7:46 PM Subject: Re: NON-PD: Re: NIH priorities and George W > In a message dated 8/5/00 4:43:56 PM Central Daylight Time, [log in to unmask] > writes: > I have seen the term "pro-life zealots" used before and I wonder just what > that conveys? Does it mean admiration for a group of people that believe > that babies, both born and unborn, are a gift from God? Or does it mean the > person using it is very intolerant of other view points? > I would venture to guess that there is a group of people that look upon > the term "pro-life zealots" as inflammatory and counter productive. > > I can still hear my dad telling me when IKE was elected that it was a good > thing to change the party in power and he said the same things when JFK was > elected. I don't believe there was any time when human right were set back > 20 years when a new administration came into the Whitehouse. I think rights > for all will go forward not back. > > Is this List going to become a political based forum or stay focused on a > common threat Parkinson's Disease? > > Denny > 58/52 >