 |
 |
Since post mortem is the only thing which is 100% sure, I really don't care if there might be a 25% chance I was misdiagnosed in my lifetime. I'm not ready to let them do an autopsy just yet. I did however, read about something new from Guilford Pharm. which is supposed to diagnosis PD. I'm sure I posted it to the net so it should be in the archives. I have to drive my husband clear across town again to the eye doctor so we will be gone most of the day. If you can't find my reference on Guilford P. let me know off line and I'll dig it out of my files when I get home. just me, Marjorie At 04:42 PM 09/07/2000 +0930, you wrote: >Ah yes! I'd just asked a question about mis-diagnosis when all this other >stuff flared up. 'Course I can see how it'd be much easier to get involved >with all that other stuff but now that it's all behind us, can I re-ask my >question? I won't post the full question again unless anybody requests it. >In short, if I'm one of the 25% found to be mis-diagnosed at post mortem >(you'll have to shout loud 'cos I won't be hearing too good) what's the >probability that I will actually have suffered something worse, better or >the same as PD? >Go for it! >Alf >Adelaide >50 <1 48