Will this is in regard to your pprivate note which made it to the list. I wanted to assure you that all Houston support and therapy groups are alive and well. This of course is a mixed blessing for those of us working in the trenches to improve the quality of life for all PWP's, while also raising money for PD research. The GOOD NEWS is that we are expanding our free services across the entire Houston metropolitan area and beyond. The BAD NEWS is that we are expanding our free services to the entire Houston metropolitan area and beyond. Why is this so important and so difficult? My plea to the other PD support group in Houston tried to convey the sense of urgency that I see and feel as President of the Houston Area Parkinson Society. Please take note that there was no infighting stated, intended or implied with our strong desire to see the groups merge into one of the best local PD support groups in the country. Houston's population growth is among the highest in the country. This means the number of Parkinsonians that we are trying to reach and serve is growing faster than most areas in the country. Our resources to deal with this growth are not infinite. While we have been very successful in our fund raising and recruiting of board members my belief is that we can always do a better job. Merger seemed like a natural step. In my opinion it will happen sooner rather than later. Change is always difficult to manage. Some people just don't want it or like it. Others thrive on it. Many, if not most, will just move with it when they have to. My hope and dream is that we in Houston will be leaders in providing local support services and in raising funds for research in search of a cure. It is difficult to do both of these well. The demands on our volunteers and staff are many and growing. With one of the finest medical centers in the world located here in Houston and the recent addition of a center with a stem cell focus it has been my intention to drive our organization(s) hard to meet the challenge in both areas. This driving intention should not be construed to mean we are infighting. The joint (8 member) team we assembled cooperated and worked well together. Their recommendations I believe will be implemented hopefully sooner rather than later. The HAPS newsletter will continue to promote the good work done by both groups. There is and will continue to be great support of the PD community in Houston. The confusion, redundancy and duplication associated with multiple groups will simply continue until we CHANGE. I wish there was a way to help you find leaders for your local group. This work is taxing mentally and physically. If you would like to chat off line I would be happy to do so. My address to merge with the other group follows. Bob Martone -------------------------------------------------------- Houston Parkinson Coalition Address To The Parkinson Foundation of Harris County April 3, 2000 Thanks for having me this afternoon. I will try to be brief while addressing a topic about a disease that is anything but brief. As you probably know grass roots advocacy in Washington has had considerable success in revamping how the National Institutes of Health and the Parkinson's community are now collaborating to improve the PD situation in this country. The Udall Bill has quadrupled the amount of money available for PD focused research. Going from approximately $24 million to $100 million. Tomorrow Dr. Gerry Fishbach, Director of the NINDS (PD center) at NIH will propose $1 billion be spent on PD research over the next 5 years. How did this happen? People and Organizations were able to put aside personal differences and belief systems and weigh the value of the potential success of a new effort to lobby Washington not as NPF or APDA or PDF or HAPS or PFHC but as a united Parkinson community. That new effort has seen the UPF of Chicago and the PDF of New York merge into one newer and stronger support structure. As I speak to you today my friend Robin Elliot, Director of the PDF in New York is in discussions with the NPF Chairman Nathan Slewett. He hopes to encourage greater cooperation between those two organizations. Who are the winners in all of this? There are 11 new PD centers of excellence. Parkinsonians get better care and Institutions get improved funding. There are now seed money grants being sponsored by many organizations making it easier for quality researchers to put together quality PD focused proposals. There are expanding pockets of collaboration being spawned across the country. And those of us hoping for a cure now have some real reasons to believe that it may be at hand. Previously warring PD organizations are now talking cooperation, coalition, merger and what it will take to bring about the quality of life improvements that so many with PD need and deserve. Yet they are also recognizing how unprepared they are for the demographic shift that is about to take place in our society. That shift is that the post World War II baby boomer generation has reached the age when PD typically strikes. The numbers that will need help could double in the next 5 years and certainly in the next 10. The cost to society is already $25 billion annually. Are our current structures and systems ready to handle what is likely to happen? Are there enough volunteers? Is there enough money? Are we ready for the unrest that will occur if this situation is not identified as a major health concern and a major budget deficit contributor? How will we support this growing need in Houston where not only is the age demographic changing but also our population growth is rising well above the national average? Can HAPS or PFHC meet this challenge with the resources that we have today and with the organization structure that we have today? I think not. It tires me just to think about it. If it doesn't tire and alarm you by just listening to me, I probably haven't put enough effort into this presentation. So, what could or should be done? Can we rely on government or the medical profession to solve this? When I became aware of the disparity in AIDS funding compared to PD funding that Washington had allowed to happen, it became clear that Washington wasn't where the answer resided. At least not without a major change in how decisions about PD research are made. So we have the Udall Movement now successfully addressing that situation. Should we rely on how the doctors & researchers will tackle this problem? Dr. Jankovic and Dr. Van Horn do great work in this community through their affiliations with their respective institutions, Baylor and the University of Texas. So I thought oh yeah they will work together because it's the right thing to do. And I looked for examples. I thought, how about the fund raising efforts in Houston for PD? And you know what I realized? The last time I saw Gage Van Horn and Joe Jankovic in the same room at a fundraiser for PD was when we had the Mohammed Ali Gala that our two organizations collaborated on. In six weeks we raised a substantial sum of money, more per week of effort than the current Gala's have raised over the past two years. My wife is being stripped of all her dignity by this damn disease. My life has been altered radically by it as well. The anguish on my children's' faces is always evident. Sometimes I selfishly think being a caregiver is tougher than having the disease because it is so frustrating to try you darndest to make the problem go away but it never does. I know many of you have been there and have experienced the loss of that loved one without the hope of a cure. I can't alter history but I damn sure can have an impact on the future and I will not succumb to the misery of PD without trying. That's why I am here today and I know that is why you are here too. It is my belief that together we can accomplish much more for our community than we can apart. We both have limited resources and mounting challenges. If you believe the demographic data I talked about earlier you must see the need for a step change in the way we do things. If the demographics don 't get your attention, how about the funding disparity such as the AIDS/PD situation. And if that doesn't work think about Dr. Jankovic and Dr. Van Horn at our Coalition dinner table. And if that doesn't work think about Nancy, and your loved one's and the impact this disease has had on you personally. Are you going about supporting the millions like us, whose best chance for help may come from collaboration and cooperation? If you conclude that what you are doing does meet the challenges of today and will meet the challenges of the future then stay the course. If you think some changes might be appropriate then let's get together to talk about what those changes might be and how we might implement them. I believe we have the nucleus to build the best PD Support system in the country. We have two dedicated boards, a few dedicated staff, many dedicated volunteers and some of the best medical facilities in the country. I would like to propose that we form and exploratory team consisting of two or three members from each board plus the two board presidents and possibly a facilitator from United Way. The tasks would be to examine the areas where increased collaboration would be likely to generate improved PD services by seeking synergistic benefits and by accessing resources and funding sources that today may be untapped. This team should report back to both boards at a time that they determine to be appropriate but should not exceed six months. Thank you for your time and attention. I would be happy to answer your questions. Bob Martone President Houston Area Parkinson's Society Bob Martone [log in to unmask] http://www.samlink.com/~bmartone ------------------------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: Parkinson's Information Exchange Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of will johnston Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 9:24 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: YOUR NEWSLETTER NINA A PRIVATE NOTE Nina, I was quite disappointed to see your swan song and the next issue from Houston. You did a real service to the PD cause in Houston which spilled over into other areas. Getting out a newsletter is no easy job. I particularly hate to see the reason for the change. We have enough to fight without having to scrap with each other. Those of us who have been leaders should ease up, learn to enjoy the pleasures of retirement while there is some enjoyable lifetime left, and let the next generation of PWP take the reins. I talked with a friend of Joan Samuelson this past week. I have known Joan since 1992 but have not talked to Joan for about a year. She has been a great leader and has done a good job, but Parkinson's is catching up with her. PAN's time had come and Michael J. Fox came on the scene just when he was needed. She was successful in her lobbying and in finding a successor. I hope the Houston group can find a worthy successor or have a successor quickly develop to continue your work. Joan needs to take things easier now, and I understand she is. I know I am slowing down. I really want to turn running the chapter and related matters over to a successor, but I have thus far found no one who is both able and willing to take over. In Houston you have a large - although widespread - population to draw from. I am not so fortunate. While you have the opportunity, have fun! Will Johnnston A.P.D.A. DelMarVA Chapter Pres. 4049 Oakland School Road Salisbury MD 21804 USA 410-543-0110