 |
 |
Good afternoon, Jen, Thank you for asking about, "May we all walk in the headdress of the sun" If you think about where the sun originated(in the beginning), and if someone prayerfully hopes that you and your family walk together in it(the headdress is the walkway-meaning the sun's rays) to its source, then, in reality, you are receiving the greatest blessings ever-for you are walking toward your God. I wish this for all of us. E or the headdress(this is a shortcut for the same meaning) At 02:44 PM 10/10/2000 -0400, you wrot >Edith, What do you mean by - May we walk together in the headdress of the >sun? Where does this statement originate? It is a beautiful statement, but >I guess I am just slow in getting what it means. Curiously, Jen Dad w/ PD >55/39 > >-----Original Message----- >From: Edith S. Love [mailto:[log in to unmask]] >Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 11:53 AM >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: PD & Non PD - A Clarification > > >Frankly, Marjorie, my intent is not to argue but to clarify whether my >request be to you, Bob or anyone else. However, I don't know the >personalities on the LIST, and oftentimes I find that there are so many >signatures-some above, some below-closures are not always clear to me. > >NOW, LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT. MY DEEPEST, MOST HUMBLE APOLOGIES, >BOB. I'LL STAND BY PATIENTLY AND IN CONTRITION WHILE I AM FLAILED WITH >CONDEMNATION. I ACCEPT MY GUILT. > >TO MARJORIE, MY SINCEREST THANKS FOR SETTING MY PC AND ME STRAIGHT(SEEMS I >CAN USE SOME ASSIST IN THE VISION DEPARTMENT, TOO). MY APOLOGIES FOR NOT >DIRECTING MY COMMENTS TO YOU INITIALLY. CERTAINLY, I CONTINUE TO LOOK >FORWARD TO YOUR RESPONSE WHICH I KNOW IS FORTHCOMING. > >In the meantime, I would also request that since many of our communiques >are lengthy and continuous-from one member to another-that some separation >be indicated. Under no circumstances would I wish to commit this faux pas >again. >I stand humbled as I enter the headdress of the sun! >Sincerely, >E >P. S. You handle the keyboard most competently, and you express yourself >beautifully and in a most caring way. My response was to comments written >for the LIST. I would hope you would post your reply in kind. If that is >uncomfortable, my email address is above. I hope that this exchange is >between new friends. There is no malice intended here. > > >At 07:17 AM 10/8/2000 -0400, you wrote: >>EDITH, >>Okay, Lets please do have some Clarification PLEASE!!!!!!!! >>How do you take a statement I made to Bob Fink, >>""I'm >>afraid that I do trust everyone, including the US Government, >> >> until I find that I can't trust them anymore?"...... Under these >>conditions, mightn't you be too late?" >>and they proceed to argue with Bob about it. >>That is MY LINE!!! >> >>If you want to argue with me about it please do it off-line. >> >> >>just me, >>Marjorie >> >> >> >> >> >> >>At 09:46 PM 10/07/2000 -0700, you wrote: >>>Bob, >>> >>>Clarification, please. Just some points that come to mind... >>> >>>IF "the price of freedom is eternal vigilance" how then can you say,>> >"I'm >>>afraid that I do trust everyone, including the US Government, >>> >> until I find that I can't trust them anymore?"...... Under these >>>conditions, mightn't you be too late? >> >> > >