hi margory : don't "blow a gasket" ;>) we need you around "Marjorie L. Moorefield" wrote: > I hate it when only specific parts of articles are picked and quoted. > In my morning newspaper there is ,in the same previously quoted article , a > statement which would certainly make me take it with a grain of salt. don't need a prescription for salt--but, highly recommended anyway all new techniques need to be scrutinized-- so they don't cause more harm than good > Since our PD is not chemically induced and since the brains of monkeys are not > the same as humans, monkey brains are as close as it gets from the the animal world that was the hardest part of my job as a lab tech in a surgery lab-- monkeys and baboons were more aware of what was going on than the other animals we used to use and there is an intelligence in their eyes and sadness or anger without words one of the techs that had been there way too long said "he would like experiment on humans---but, they wouldn't let him" actually that happens in the next step of "clinical" trials > this make persons grasping for straws only hope forsomething > which ,more than likely will never happen. I think this is cruel to publish > such hopeful > things to the public, and I think researchers only do it to try to get more > research money. They should have held this article until it went to the FDA and > was > approved by them for testing. > with the recent problems encountered from the death of a young man undergoing experimental viral gene therapy--the NIH is going to be hesitant to ok anything that may cause another unexpected death i saw the father of the young man testify before congress they had been poorly informed of the risks he was very emotionally upset -- of course but, did not want it to happen again -- to anyone top level NIH personnel were called upon to testify also and the bureaucracy of NIH is going to be tightened up so that clinical studies get done "by the book" two monkeys died of unexplained causes one from each group--treated and untreated the untreated control died from the procedure the treated could have died from the procedure or the virus or something else happened unexplained causes of death will be a big problem > I quote from the same article: > Dr. Mark Tuszynski, head of a brain-disorder research center at the University > of California at San Diego, said the experiment in monkeys was "fascinating". > He said, however, that it is not known whether the brain cells affected by > the chemically induced Parkinson's in monkeys are precisely the same as those > affected by > the actual disease in humans. > there are alternative chemically induced models for parkinsons but, this model is as good as it gets and has been used for years. Zap the dopaminergic cells in a monkey brain (or rat, or dog, or whatever) brain then try to get recovery. all our new drugs for parkinsons has come from this model mirapex, requip, sylegilene (sp?), etc.... you name it some animal has been scrutinized and their reactions and carefully statistically defined. go to the vet and your pet dog has all kinds of drugs available that humans use too. > It continues: > Kordower said a separate safety study is under way in monkeys, and when > that is completed in about six months an application for human clinical trials > will > be prepared for presentation to the Food and Drug Administration. i think this must reference to a safety study and must refer to viral gene therapy in general. It is probably needed to address the concerns of the NIH as related above there is research going on to try to get around using virus vectors --hard to do. > If all of the studies go smoothly, said Kordower, the gene therapy could be > ready for human testing in three to five years. big "IF" Margory -- goes back to your concern about getting hopes up but, this guy covered his "you know what" with that big "IF" > At 09:00 AM 10/27/2000 -0400, you wrote: > >Gene therapy used to turn back clock on Parkinson's > > > << BIG SNIP OF ARTICLE>> and thanks janet for passing along this information i still like getting my hopes up but, for some of you, it must indeed be difficult, after many years of waiting for "the cure" > > >janet paterson > >53 now / 44 dx cd / 43 onset cd / 41 dx pd / 37 onset pd faith is trust faith is hope, courage and confidence and so much more don't give up yet this may not be the answer to prayers but, there is a lot going on out there .......................................................................... Ray Strand ...on the edge of the prairie abyss ...................... .......................................................................... 48/47 dx/40 ? onset pd ..........................................................................