 |
 |
You are absolutely right on Jo Ann about no room for slander in this campaign. However, what I don't understand is why you and others then do the same thing by implying that Gore is responsible for the leak of information when there isn't one shred of evidence to prove it. In fact, the evidence is there of who actually did leak the information (no connection with the Gore campaign). What does Gore's father have to do with it? Where is the evidence of his imappropriate behavior? Why condemn slander, then dish some back? We are seeing slander involving a real event and "false" slander involving an untruth and unproven information and neither is acceptable. Can't we be civilized? on 11/3/00 10:07 PM, Jo Ann Coen at [log in to unmask] wrote: > Greg - Big money, alcohol, cocaine, and wild parties can go for both > people. Gore's father was some high ranking political figure, who lost > favor, for some outstanding thing he did. If you had twin daughters, > wouldn't you want to keep a DUI from them? In fact, it was so many > years ago, he probably forgot it. I would have, and I frankly > think you would have to. There's no need to berate one candidate > and build up another. Most people have already decided who they are > going to vote for, and any more slander just falls back onto the person > doing the slandering. You know I love you (on list), but sometimes I > think you go too far. Jo Ann >