 |
 |
ahhhh, may be so, but still my choice is not to opt for telephone voice you think that email can't be traced? mysterious people with tracks erased? my dear, enter the world of modern tech before you give the rest of us heck who like email where words easily flow- don't take effort 'cause our words slow with voices as quiet as summer rain drops fall silently on the terrain. so while i salute alexander g. b. email is still the choice for me my wish is a wonderful day for you all-- but just don't wait for my telephone call....... now i leave you with a smile for today :)))) my curse to the wind is winding away so many topics have appeared on the list my poor mind is boggled -get the gist? my time frame hampered, my intent still good i will post a verse as i promised i would. barb k 62/61/who knows? At 05:52 AM 12/1/00 -0500, you wrote: >for creating such a miraculous boon to communication > >voice to voice >is now the old fashioned way > >voice to voice >is now the safest way > >voice to voice >is traceable in caller ID and phone company records > >voice to voice >is submittable as evidence in a court of law > >i have been >stalked >harassed >threatened >and manipulated >by e-mail personae >who have not been who they claimed they were >whose e-mail identity is 'protected' and concealed >by the internet 'frontier' atmosphere > >that 'protection' >behind which only cowards cower >becomes irrelevant and transparent >when a phone call and voice to voice communication is suggested > >try it >you will like it > > >janet > >janet paterson, an akinetic rigid subtype parkie >53 now /44 dx cd / 43 onset cd /41 dx pd / 37 onset pd >TEL: 613 256 8340 SMAIL: POBox 171 Almonte Ontario K0A 1A0 Canada >EMAIL: [log in to unmask] URL: http://www.geocities.com/janet313/