 |
 |
now now, jo ann. maybe she was jes funnin' you, cuz we all know yer a re-ally nice person. besides yew was just followin instructions frum barb p - didn't she say we wuz to post our little disagreements privately??? so how kin thet be har-rass-ment? an we know dear sweet lil elf duzn't hesitate to speak out when she has tah accuse a-nonee-mouse peeples. mah, mah duzn't thet beat all git out--lol, roflol whut do we hev here? a dubbel-standard? bless mah soul, an aftah thet good person layed hands on this list fer healin' & wuz told she hev a good ima-gee-nashun. lol .. now lak mah deer granny always said--consider the source for yew get het up. so lets all calm down & hev a good day, yew heah.... an maybe thet person bettah lay hans on us agin-- needs a dubble dose fer these peeples. or maybe mistah santee claws return & takes all the stuff yew got this mornin' --don nobody want thet tah happin......:))) At 11:16 AM 12/25/00 -0500, you wrote: >Janet - once again, and only once again, I will TELL you I was NOT >harrassing Gail. I was expressing an opinion. Also, you and a couple >others always say to post personal mail. Well, I did and she put it on >the list. So what's the use of posting personal mail? Perpetrator, my >ass. I didn't commit a crime and please don't make it out to be one. As >for as Gail is concerned? that is between the two of us, and you'd be >better off staying out of it. Now are you going to call me a perpetrator >for telling you to butt out? Jo Ann