 |
 |
Janet You questioned Katherine's interest in your post....I certainly do not speak for her but in my humble opinion, I think that if you send/share a message with the list you need to be prepared to get responses and opinions from others in the group. Kelly in Calgary ----- Original Message ----- From: janet paterson <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Janet / voices from the past > hi all > > At 16:33 2000/12/29 -0500, kathrynne wrote: > >janet paterson wrote: > >> how can i be 'guilty' of something > >> which has not be issued to the membership? > >> janet > > > >I see no mention of the word "guilty" in John's private post to you, > >which you chose to forward to PIEN. Did you exclude the word before you > >posted it to the List? > >Kathrynne > > sorry kathrynne > > i exluded nothing from his post > and never do without indicating such editing by "..." > and decribing the quoted post as "in part" > > we may be at odds over semantics here > > john DID NOT use the word: > "guilty" > but DID USE the words: > "violation of netiquette" > "frowned upon" > and > "violation of the list charter" > > i'm curious as to your interest in my communication with john > if he is offended, can he not speak for himself? > if he is not offended, why the interest? > > couldn't this time be better spent on sharing pd information? > > janet > > janet paterson, an akinetic rigid subtype parkie > 53 now /44 dx cd / 43 onset cd /41 dx pd / 37 onset pd > TEL: 613 256 8340 SMAIL: POBox 171 Almonte Ontario K0A 1A0 Canada > EMAIL: [log in to unmask] URL: http://www.geocities.com/janet313/ >