Print

Print


Hi All -

As many of you know, last Fall I was contacted by an official at the National
Institutes Of Health in Washington, DC.  "Would you be interested in being on
a Government committee concerned with xenotransplantation?"  "Yes" was my
immediate response.  Soooo, after mountains of paper work went back and forth
between Washington and my home in Rhode Island, (the FedEx guy was busy!) the
appointment to this panel was approved.

The first meeting of the Secretary's Advisory Committee On
Xenotransplantation - SACX - took place this past week.  It was quite an
experience.  Read on.

To begin, their coordinator booked and paid for the airline tickets and hotel
room.  A private car was sent to pick me up at the airport.  Everything went
very smoothly.

To put it simply, I (just an ordinary guy) really got the VIP treatment!
Everybody I dealt with was most kind and helpful.

That evening (Monday) there was a welcoming dinner/reception where the
members and a few NIH staff got to meet and chat.  It was very nice.

At 8:30 the next morning the meeting began.  I was shocked at what I found in
the conference room.  I was told that the committee of 20 members would
convene and discuss various issues related to xenotransplantation.  Little
did I grasp about the enormity of it!  There were Government officials, the
committee members, scientists, industry executives, physicians, researchers,
psychologists, etc.  About 100 people were attending.  US Surgeon General
David Satcher swore in the committee members and then gave opening remarks.
The members, seated at 3 large tables, introduced themselves.  It was set up
like a Congressional hearing.  We all had microphones at are seats.

The rest of the day was spent in discussion of what topics we would be
working on.  We have been charged with establishing Government guidelines for
xenotransplantation.  Subjects include economic, social, and psychological
issues.  Also, there are such things as disease transmission, animal welfare,
and safety.

The next day brought an expansion of the previous session's work.  And there
were speeches and presentations by several members and others who are
involved with this program.  I was called to give a speech from the patient's
viewpoint.  (I am the only patient on the panel.)  I gave my little talk and
showed a "before & after" video.  Much to my relief it was very well accepted
by everyone.

It is truly exciting to be a part of this important process.  And I am
humbled by the vast array of medical specialists I'll be working with.

The next gathering is scheduled for sometime in May/June.

Jim Finn