Hi Gail, janet, & Fran, Fran, you may be correct... but, I think there is another possibility.... Some Servers will Return mail that contains Header information in the Body if the Header info is not preceded by > The initial Returned mail was due to syntax... indirect vs. idirect Subsequent Returned mail may have been spawned by including Header info in the Body... just a thought ..... regards ... murray On 30 Mar 2001, at 17:37, Fran Peck wrote: > Gail and Janet, > I received the following from a web hosting provider for our business > web site and it may explain why the email isn't going through. > > Northpoint was, emphasis on past tense, one of the largest providers of > DSL access in the country. > > They have been purchased by AT&T which is not interested in maintaining > the customer base - apparently only wanting the equipment. > > AT&T has been summarily and without notice shutting down DSL access to > customers nationwide, beginning apparently yesterday with Southern > California. > > You may not even know you were, or are, being provided access via > Northpoint, as they worked through resellers. If you receive this > email, hopefully you're not - or you may not have been shut off yet. > > Our web servers do NOT rely on DSL service, so your site will not be > affected by this series of events. But if you have DSL and find you > lose access - this may be the cause. > > Fran Peck > Tempe, AZ > Email: [log in to unmask] > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:03:12 -0500, Parkinson's Information Exchange > Network wrote: > > > I know that is your address ONCE I put *indirect* ONLY ONCE!!!!!! > > ...a very very frustrated Gail > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender SNIP **** [log in to unmask] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn