I know that is your address ONCE I put *indirect* ONLY ONCE!!!!!!
...a very very frustrated Gail
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:51:16 -0500
From: Mail Delivery System <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[log in to unmask]:
SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:<[log in to unmask]>:
host ld.mx.idirect.com [207.136.80.184]:
550 BUCE not accepted by this server.
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from 66-44-56-236.s236.tnt2.lnhva.md.dialup.rcn.com
([66.44.56.236] helo=erols.com)
by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #5)
id 14j7je-0006NX-00
for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:51:15 -0500
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:51:39 -0500
From: Gail Vass <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: janet paterson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [Fwd: test number six]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
back atcha
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: test number six
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:39:50 -0500
From: janet paterson <[log in to unmask]>
To: gail vass <[log in to unmask]>
CC: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
gaga
this is the last email from you that made it through:
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:26:24 -0500
>To: janet paterson <[log in to unmask]>
>From: janet paterson <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: test
>
>testing
>
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net
>[207.172.4.62])
> by phobos.idirect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA40370
> for <[log in to unmask]>; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:09:19 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from 66-44-64-102.s102.tnt6.lnhva.md.dialup.rcn.com
>([66.44.64.102] helo=erols.com)
> by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #5)
> id 14hC7z-0004eG-00
> for [log in to unmask]; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:08:24 -0500
>Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:08:37 -0500
>From: Gail Vass <[log in to unmask]>
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
>X-Accept-Language: en
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: janet paterson <[log in to unmask]> <------ MY CORRECT ADDRESS
>Subject: Almonte, Ontario: Guestbook
>Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
> boundary="------------F1BB37AFE428796A5B137EC9"
>Status:
>
>http://www.almonte.com/al-guest.html
>
>....so Oprah has been there????
i think the problem has to be in my address
(indirect.com vs idirect.com)
as it appears in your computer somewhere
did you change e-mail software?
replace an e-mail address book?
that error message that i was able to generate the other day
result when i sent my test message to [log in to unmask]
i will therefore, copy this message to me
at IDIRECT.COM and also to me
at INDIRECT.COM
so we can look at the specific differences
here goes
me
janet paterson, an akinetic rigid subtype, albeit perky, parky
PD: 54/41/37 CD: 54/44/43 TEL: 613 256 8340 EMAIL: [log in to unmask]
"A New Voice" home page: http://www.geocities.com/janet313/ .
"New Voice News" latest posts: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nvnNET/ .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
