Ah, Peter, you've identified the Perennial Inkshed Problem: How to balance people's need to present with the need of the conference to have a more leisurely schedule than most conferences allow. I think you're right about this: >From my limited experience, it is at THIS point (after inkshedding and immediate sharing) that discussion is most >fruitful. That is, even though discussion lets only one mouth speak at a time--there is an increased dialogic quality >to discussion when everyone has written and then read at least 5 to 10 inksheds. I found that the publication of >bits of inkshed the next morning--while terrific--was not a substitute for the more immediately interactive process I >just described. The published bits are such tiny snippets--and there's little processing of them after they are >distributed. I heard some people saying that the inkshedding felt boring. I think this is a function of it's not being >processed more. It really does change the dynamic of the discussion if the discussion begins *after* inkshedding, when everyone has read half a dozen inksheds (and therefore knows what six other people thought). The questions tend to be more well-formulated, to operate on many levels, to provoke better, more exploring-of-issues kinds of discussion and less "here's what *I* think" kinds of comments (the kind I'm really guilty of!). There is indeed something profound about reading the inksheds while the ink is still wet -- before they've been distilled into the "printable" bits. There's something wonderful about reading your session inksheds afterwards, too, when they've been marked by several people, and you can clearly see that yes, several people responded to one bit or another. > I fear this sounds ungrateful or not understanding. For of course I > understand perfectly well the cause of this situation. I often saw Doug > TRYING for more inkshedding--and apologizing and being uncomfortable at > not having more time for it and for sharing. And of course the lack of > time came from what might be called a deeply "inksheddish" and "dialogic" > tradition at your conferences: the tradition (I gather) of accepting ALL > proposals and avoiding concurrent sessions. Doug (and the agenda > planners) had no choice but to push us relentlessly from presentation to > presentation. I think there are many elements that go into making inkshedding dialogic in the ways that you've described it. And as you so rightly perceive, this kind of inkshedding has to be orchestrated very carefully. Time enough to do it is one factor, to be sure . . . and there are ways to organize the conference, as you suggest, so that enough time can be built in. There are others factors as well. I'm thinking out loud here, and I'm writing this partly for Linda, who has the task of organizing this conference after having only attended once -- I think our shared observations could really help her out! One really important factor is the physical layout of the room. It should be easy for people to pass the inksheds around after they've been written; tables where people sit on more than one side tend to focus the group's attention to the other participants and make it easier to see when people are done writing and to exchange papers. At Canmore it was hard to share Inksheds because you could really only be attentive to what the people sitting next to you were doing; I, at least, didn't feel part of a group of people inkshedding together the way I have at other conferences. Also, I think it's absolutely crucial that the people who want to talk after a session be provided with immediate and convenient egress, so that the conversations don't interrupt people who are trying to write. Not everybody wants to write after every session, and that's okay . . . we've all had the experience of feeling completely brain-dead at some points in the conference, and sometimes catching up with that person you haven't seen in years takes precedence. But those activities ought not to disrupt the conference program agenda. Another important factor is the editorial process. I think there's value in turning the inksheds around quickly -- ie, having the morning session's inksheds available by the end of the day, at least (sooner if possible), and having the afternoon inksheds available the following morning. The sooner people have the inksheds the sooner they, too, become part of the ongoing dialogue of the conference and the more seriously people attend to the reading and writing (which gets harder and harder to do as the conference goes on and people get tired). In past years we've had groups of conferees volunteer to transcribe each session's inksheds, and I'm kind of ambivalent about not doing that this year; on the one hand, it was nice not to have that responsibility, but on the other, I kind of missed getting my hands dirty, so to speak . . . and I missed the camaraderie of sitting with others trying to decipher handwriting, and of reading each other bits that seemed significant but that *didn't* get marked . . . Well, that's all I can think of . . . I'm sure others will have more ideas. Peter, you've unwittingly tapped into another Inkshed tradtion, which is the annual post-conference "what worked/what didn't" discussion . . . and let me say while I'm at it that one of the things that *really* worked for me this year was the quality of the presentations -- many were not the traditional readings of papers, and many were works-in-progess where we as the audience were invited, through inkshedding, to help people think through a problem or otherwise add our perspective. Also, many of the presentations resonated particularly loudly with the others in their session. I think the call for participation must have been especially welcoming of alternative formats, and the conference committee did a terrific job of organizing the presentations into sessions. Marcy =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Marcy Bauman Media Consultant College of Pharmacy University of Michigan 734-647-2227 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties, write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask] For the list archives and information about the organization, the annual conference, and publications, go to the Inkshed Web site at http://www.StThomasU.ca/inkshed/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-