Print

Print


CBC News Online
Health advocates demand more testing of natural remedies
WebPosted Tue Jun  5 13:47:11 2001
OTTAWA - Consumer health groups in Canada say they're worried
about the federal government's plans to regulate natural health
products.

Health experts say it's almost impossible to meet the same regulatory
standards as prescription drugs

LINK: Natural Health Products Directorate
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb/onhp/welcome_e.html

Canadians for Rational Health Policy (CRHP) says the proposed
guidelines for regulations are too lax because they will depend
on evidence of "traditional use".

RELATED STORY: Ottawa sets up natural health products office
http://cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view.cgi?category=Canada&story=/news/1999/03/26/health990226

Dr. Lloyd Oppel of CRHP says dropping the standards protect
the manufacturers' interests.

Canada's new Natural Health Products Directorate will use three levels
of evidence to approve natural health remedies:

random controlled trials
traditional use
initial evidence (for new products)

The NHPD will be running in early 2002.

HEALTH MATTERS: Healthy Herbs
http://newsworld.cbc.ca/programs/sites/viewer.cgi?FILE=HM20010516.html&TEMPLATE=healthmatters.ssi&SC=HM

Phliip Waddington, who heads the directorate, says all the bodies
of evidence will be used because running the remedies through
double-blind clinical trials could take up to 20 years.

Label may say 'traditionaly used for…
For example, echinacea has been on the market for years now. It is
seen as being useful in treating colds and flus, but there aren't many
clinical trials to prove the case.  The directorate may label the drug as
"traditionally used for…" rather than require a battery of tests.

RELATED STORY: More Canadians relying on natural health
remedies
http://cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view.cgi?category=Consumers&story=/news/2000/08/08/Consumers/drugs_natural000808

Oppel says that's not good enough. He says there's no substitute
for controlled laboratory tests.

But health experts say it's almost impossible to meet the same
regulatory standards as prescription drugs. Drugs contain one or
two active ingredients whereas herbal remedies can have hundreds.

There are no international guidelines on how to control natural health
products. The U.S. considers them dietary supplements so the onus
is on the producers to provide data supporting their claims.

Germany regulates them as drugs but Australia's approach is closer
to Canada's proposals.

Australia uses scientific to traditional-use standards of evidence to
qualify the drugs.

Oppel says using the traditional-use argument means companies
won't have to invest in testing.

Waddington says the regulations have to be appropriate to the
industry. In the case of natural health products, the companies tend
to be small to medium-sized.

He says once the regulatory framework is approved, manufacturers
have three years to obtain a product license and to meet the new
requirements.

Written by CBC News Online staff

http://cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view.cgi?/news/2001/06/05/Consumers/organicregulations_0100605

************

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn