Print

Print


Stem cells of hope: Government must take lead in research
(Published July 7, 2001)

The miracle of modern fertility technology may eventually create
an even greater medical spinoff  -- treatments for ailments such as
diabetes and Parkinson's Disease.


 Yet for the government to
lead in this exciting medical pursuit, President Bush must take the
politically touchy step of allowing federal funding of research on
stem cells derived from human embryos, a move opposed by some
but not all opponents of abortion. If Bush doesn't squarely place
the federal government as the leader of this research, he will open
the door to unregulated use of human embryos by the private
sector, and the possibility of ethical and medical problems.

Scientists hope to use stem cells, which are the precursor of the
many different cell and tissue types in the human body, as medical
repair kits, growing new cells to aid damaged tissues or organs.
The best sources of cells for research are surplus human embryos
derived from in vitro fertilization but which would otherwise be
discarded after a woman seeking fertility treatment becomes
pregnant. Harvesting stem cells from such embryos does not
prevent or end a prospective life.

Bush must navigate around an existing congressional ban on all
federal research on human embryos. The Clinton administration
mapped such a course, issuing a ruling that allows the government
to pay for research on stem cells so long as the scientists receiving
federal funds do not work on the embryos themselves. Bush is now
reviewing this strategy.

The politics here don't follow the classic battle lines over abortion.
A coalition of Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. Senate
(including Republicans Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Orrin
Hatch of Utah) support funding of stem cell research and may push
their case with new legislation.

The question here for Bush is not whether stem cell research will
go ahead, but how such research will be conducted. Biotechnology
companies are already busy studying these cells, with nothing to
prevent them from purchasing unneeded embryos from fertility
centers. Private discoveries will lead to private patents and likely
greater costs to patients for treatments than if the public had
underwritten the discoveries.

It would be unethical for couples or fertility clinics to consider
creating human embryos simply to sell their stem cells. But that
would inevitably happen  --  if not here, then abroad  --  if federal
rules and federal funding of research do not dominate this field.
Bush should not throw away an exciting chance to treat disease
and ethically guide stem cell research simply because the politics
are too touchy.

http://www.sacbee.com/voices/news/voices01_20010707.html

* * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn