 |
 |
> Subject: Re: auto response messages / to MJF office > From: Camilla Flintermann <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:52:07 -0400 > Comments: To: CARE list <[log in to unmask]> Please be aware that the MJF office is working on this ! Let's not jump to conclusions till we hear from them. I have fwd to them many of the post from PIEN with various questions and theories, BTW. >Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:48:54 -0400 >To: [log in to unmask] >From: Camilla Flintermann <[log in to unmask]> >Subject: Re: auto response messages >Cc: >Bcc: >X-Attachments: > > >Dear Christine > >I hope you will soon be able to send an explanation of the problem to BOTH >the PIEN and CARE lists (a sublist I run for caregivers of PWPs} You can >send it to me for CARE, BTW. >The response I saw tonight seemed directed ONLY to PIEN, and we are having >the same problem on CARE. Is someone at the MJFF subscribed to CARE I >wonder? >There is a lot of confusion on PIEN as to what is going on, suggestions it >is a scam to get money because of the old address, etc in the message. >Please clarify ASAP for your sake and ours ! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn