Ron very thought-provoking indeed. I wish President Bush could view your response. [log in to unmask] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Camilla Flintermann" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM Subject: Re: Mis-impression of advocacy--caution needed > Dear Ron--- > > You wrote in part-- > > >As an ordained clergyman, I am perplexed and dismayed that religion, which > >exists primarily to support, encourage and enhance life, would instead be > >used to inhibit research which could lead to the enhancement and prolonging > >of life, and yet is done in the name of standing up for life! Since when do > >we elevate the importance of potential life (stem cells) over that of > >actual, produced life - existing, breathing, walking, talking human beings? > > > SNIPPED > > Thank you for your very educational post which sets the "religious > objections" to stem cell research in a different perspective than we > usually see. I learned a lot, and appreciate your taking the trouble to > post it. If you have no objection, I would like to share it with the > publisher whose remarks provoked my letter to the editor--OK? > > > Camilla Flintermann <[log in to unmask]> > > > on the web at http://www.geocities.com/camillahf/index.html > > **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** > "... Meet people where they are now, > not where you hoped they might be........" > --Christine Greenland > **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn