Print

Print


Ron very thought-provoking indeed.  I wish President Bush could view your
response.
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Camilla Flintermann" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Mis-impression of advocacy--caution needed


> Dear Ron---
>
> You wrote in part--
>
> >As an ordained clergyman, I am perplexed and dismayed that religion,
which
> >exists primarily to support, encourage and enhance life, would instead be
> >used to inhibit research which could lead to the enhancement and
prolonging
> >of life, and yet is done in the name of standing up for life!  Since when
do
> >we elevate the importance of potential life (stem cells) over that of
> >actual, produced life - existing, breathing, walking, talking human
beings?
> >
> SNIPPED
>
> Thank you for your very educational post which sets the "religious
> objections" to stem cell research in a  different perspective than we
> usually see.  I learned a lot, and appreciate your taking the trouble to
> post it.  If you have no objection, I would like to share it with the
> publisher whose remarks provoked my letter to the editor--OK?
>
>
>       Camilla Flintermann             <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>       on the web at   http://www.geocities.com/camillahf/index.html
>
>            ****    ****    ****    ****   ****    ****    ****    ****
>         "... Meet people where  they are  now,
>                  not where you hoped they might be........"
>                 --Christine Greenland
>           ****    ****    ****    ****    ****    ****    ****    ****
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:
mailto:[log in to unmask]
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn