 |
 |
At 11:57 AM 4/18/2002 -0400, you wrote: >hi all > >if there are no distinctly condscending words >and no condescension intended or even considered by the sender >and a message is seen by some recipients as condescending >could it be that the condescension >is in the eye of the recipient >and not the sender? > >how then can the sender correct the misunderstanding? > >perceptions are our choice > >is our will to resolve a conflict >or is it to advance one? > >janet > >Well Said. > >janet paterson: an akinetic rigid subtype, albeit perky, parky >pd: 55/41/37 cd: 55/44/43 tel: 613 256 8340 email: [log in to unmask] >smail: 375 Country Street, Almonte, Ontario, Canada, K0A 1A0 >a new voice: http://www.geocities.com/janet313/ > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] >In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn