Print

Print


Hi Emily,
I liked you letter and was just wondering where you live? I to grew up very
poor. I am the oldest of ten, my father drank allot, if it was not for my
mother being able to sew cloths for us and to put fruit and veggies and the
dear my dad got out of season there would not have been anything on our
dinner table. I did grow up a very happy person, my mom made life livable
and exciting. Janice
----- Original Message -----
From: Emily and Julian Brinac <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: perceiving conflict


> Janet,
> I assume you did not have intention to hurt anybody. Sometimes it is how
> we say instead of what is being said. Of course, there could be
> misunderstanding due to our own perception. Again, one has to be careful
> not to put the matter at rest by saying it is being perceived
> incorrectly. My vocabulary is not very eloquent, but the whole idea
> reminded me on a discussion: IF CHICKEN BECAME BEFORE THE EGG OR EGG WAS
> THERE BEFORE THE CHICKEN. I know that religion and politics are very
> intertwined. Janet, I came from the very poor part of the world. Being
> poor beyond the today's imagination of most people, our little land what
> you might call for the size of the GARDEN was SACRED. It was not just
> the land, it was a meaning of life. It is easier to be at peace when you
> live relatively comfortable life. I cherish my understanding, my little
> own perspective, of Middle East conflict. (I am not taking any sides...)
> This is my contribution to discussion on conflict. I just hope that my
> message is clear. Thank you for reading.
> Emily
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "janet paterson" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:57 AM
> Subject: perceiving conflict
>
>
> > hi all
> >
> > if there are no distinctly condscending words
> > and no condescension intended or even considered by the sender
> > and a message is seen by some recipients as condescending
> > could it be that the condescension
> > is in the eye of the recipient
> > and not the sender?
> >
> > how then can the sender correct the misunderstanding?
> >
> > perceptions are our choice
> >
> > is our will to resolve a conflict
> > or is it to advance one?
> >
> > janet
> >
> >
> >
> > janet paterson: an akinetic rigid subtype, albeit perky, parky
> > pd: 55/41/37 cd: 55/44/43 tel: 613 256 8340 email:
> [log in to unmask]
> > smail: 375 Country Street, Almonte, Ontario, Canada, K0A 1A0
> > a new voice: http://www.geocities.com/janet313/
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:
mailto:[log in to unmask]
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn