The following excerpts are from transcript of: National Public Radio (NPR) - Talk of the Nation/Science from June 21, 2002 . Although Dr. Verfaillie's research is with adult stem cells, she makes a strong statement that both embryonic and adult stem cell research should continue. This may be useful in rebutting those who would argue against ESC research. Her research was recently published in Nature, along with Dr Ron McKay's paper on embryonci stem cells. Linda HEADLINE: Catherine Verfaillie discusses her latest research on stem cells IRA FLATOW, host: " This is TALK OF THE NATION/SCIENCE FRIDAY. I'm Ira Flatow. ... But first, two papers published yesterday in the journal Nature may give another boost to the debate over how stem cell research should be conducted, one paper showing the promise of the embryonic approach, the other saying that adult stem cells may be more flexible than previously thought. Joining me now to talk about the work is Catherine Verfaillie, director of the Stem Cell Institute at the University of Minnesota.... FLATOW: ... What are these new stem cells? Dr. VERFAILLIE: Well, so we found these cells in bone marrow of humans, but the paper that was just recently published was really on bone marrow from mice and rats. It's a very rare cell, so we think it's only one in a million, so there's not very many of them. And if we take these cells out of the bone marrow and culture them in the laboratory, they appear to have the potential to differentiate into many, many different cell types in the culture itself.... FLATOW: Are these cells better than embryonic stem cells? Dr. VERFAILLIE: I think it's way too early to say that they would be better or even equally potent. So what we've been able to show is if we place these into this blastocyst they appear to behave the same way. In culture dishes--if you try to test what they can do in culture dishes, they appear to be better at doing some things than embryonic stem cells and much worse than making some other cell types. And the example, for instance: Embryonic stem cells make very easily heart muscle cells, and we have had a difficult time to do that in a culture dish, even though in this experiment in the blastocyst, that did work. Our cells appeared to make very easily cells that look like liver, which is the difference from embryonic stem cells, which do that a little bit less well. So there are definitely differences between the two... FLATOW: ... Do you have any idea why it would have troubled--these MAPC cells might have trouble making one kind of cells and not the other? Dr. VERFAILLIE: We really don't have no good idea at this point in time. You know, it might be that we haven't really figured out how the culture should be set up to do that--that's definitely possible--or there may be inherent differences bet--you know, there are probably inherent differences between the two cells, such that one of them is more coaxable in one direction than the other.... FLATOW: There was another very intriguing paper published also in the journal Nature by Dr. Ron McKay and his colleagues at NIH. Dr. VERFAILLIE: Mm-hmm. FLATOW: Can you talk about that a little bit? Dr. VERFAILLIE: Yeah. So what Dr. McKay was showing is that he can specifically direct embryonic stem cells from mice and rats to go through the different steps that the cells would go through in development in the brain to ultimately end up to become the dopamine neuron, which is important to guide our movements, and it's the cell that dies in patients with Parkinson's disease. So what he was able to show is that, with the very well-defined conditions that he developed, he can make the cells go through a number of steps that get them on the way to become dopamine neurons, and then take these cells and implant them back into an animal that has Parkinson's, and proved that these cells could completely correct the abnormal behavior, the abnormal movements of the animal. And so I think the importance of that study is that he was able to show that you can take embryonic stem cells and truly make them in a differentiated cell type that now can correct a defective organ in vivo in an animal model.... Dr. VERFAILLIE: You know, his studies aren't quite ready for human therapies. But it's, I think, one of the first papers that provide true concepts that these embryonic stem cells can really be told how to behave to ultimately be clinically useful. FLATOW: Well, if he's proved that you can do it with embryonic stem cells, doesn't that throw the gauntlet down to you now to take your MAPC cells... Dr. VERFAILLIE: Very much so. And so what we've been able to show is that the cells can make cells that look like neurons and express some of these proteins that he finds in his cells. What we haven't shown yet is that we can do the exact same experiment, and that's take the MAPCs and use them to go through these X number of steps and then put them back into the brain of an animal and prove that you can correct a disease. And so we haven't really shown all these potentially clinical applications yet, so we've only really--you know, we're at the beginning of, you know, where embryonic stem cells in the mice were many, many years ago. And so we have a cell that has characteristics that are similar to it, even though it's not exactly the same. And so time will need to tell whether MAPCs can do the same thing. FLATOW: Mm-hmm. Are you working on experiments now along those lines? Dr. VERFAILLIE: So we're working on experiments both in the Parkinson's disease model and the diabetes model, and in liver disease models... FLATOW: Any preliminary results you can share with us? Dr. VERFAILLIE: In vivo, we are just starting to do these studies, so we can't really say very much about it yet because it just takes time to actually prove that it will work or won't. So we're working hard to do that but, you know, we're just initiating the study so we really don't have any data yet... Dr. Verfaillie, do you think that one kind of stem cell is going to win out over the other, embryonic vs. adult? Or you think we equally need to still look at both of them? Dr. VERFAILLIE: I'm really convinced that we need to look at both of them. You know, we're obviously excited about what we have, but that's--you know, like I said, you know, there are differences between the cells, so it's quite possible that down the line we can't really induce one cell to all the cell types with a great efficiency, and the other cell is better at it. You know, so I think it might turn out that some cells will be useful for one type of disease and other cells for another disease, but I also think that, you know, we cross-fertilize, and it's such early times for both cell types that I think it's way too early to say that we should give up one for the other at this point in time.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn