 |
 |
A smaller number of messages does not necessarily reflect negatively on the value of the list. In my observation, some of the times we have had the largest number of messages, many (sometimes most) of them were off subject and were often related to controversies not related to the purpose of the list. It has been a few months since we have had that problem. Dave Bergford 61 now / 58 dx./ 55 onset [log in to unmask] ----- Original Message ----- From: "janet paterson" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:51 AM Subject: the way we were - parkinsn r.i.p. > > from 20021020 to 20021024 -> 45 messages. > > from 20011020 to 20011024 -> 86 messages. > > from 20001020 to 20001024 -> 137 messages. > > from 19991020 to 19991024 -> 283 messages. > > from 19981020 to 19981024 -> 265 messages. > > from 19971020 to 19971024 -> 267 messages. > > from 19961020 to 19961024 -> 144 messages. > > from 19951020 to 19951024 -> 100 messages. > > from 19941020 to 19941024 -> 27 messages. > > > janet paterson: an akinetic rigid subtype, albeit primarily perky, parky > pd: 55-41-37 cd: 55-44-43 tel: 613-256-8340 email: [log in to unmask] > smail: 301-375 Country Street, Almonte, Ontario, Canada, K0A 1A0 > a new voice website: http://www.geocities.com/janet313/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn