 |
 |
Hi...thanks for your response...the auto-reply came from Kim DeRosa at JER (J.E.Roberts) company...aren't they the big, I mean REALLY BIG, real estate investment company with offices in all parts of the world...I ask because years ago while in London we stayed at a bed and breakfast owned by one of their senior officers. How are you connected with JER company? And I agree with you that it is strange my receiving the auto-reply but strange for a different reason... I had sent my email directly to the PARKINSN LIST and NOT TO YOU....now, that's really strange, the PARKINSNS LIST sending me YOUR auto-reply. You can tell me the answer to that one when you figure it out....I do appreciate your referring my question to the doctors for a scientific response. I just believe in value for the money I spend and if it's not a good complete CoQ10, then why waste money taking .it....anxiously waiting your reply...thanks...Joan Hartman ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. Warner Mills" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 10:53 PM Subject: Re: Out of Office AutoReply: J Warner > No, indeed, this is not an autoreply. Please let me know which of the addresses > sent that reply? Let me assure you that I myself, in fact personally wrote that > reply this evening, about my brother, etc. I must check what occurred here. I > wasn't even aware of the auto responder being present. Don't jump to > conclusions, please. I take Parkinson's seriously and would not play a cruel > joke on anyone.. That's just not the kind of person I am. > > Ms Hartman, I don't have an answer at hand regarding your question. I will > refer it to one of the doctors who work with the products so that I may provide > a scientific response. Thank you for your patience. > I'm really concerned about the "out of office" reply. First I am not aware of a > message of this kind being routinely sent by me or by anyone on my behalf. I am > at my home at this moment and every message to the list has been written in real > time by me, personally. I do not have any letters discussing my personal > experiences sent out as information. My e-mail of 12/23/02 is a true first > person account. This is the very first time that I have committed this > experience to writing. I have received email off line from list members who know > that I am a real person, who is genuinely interested in sharing with others. > Someone may be tinkering with my communications. Please let me know if anyone > receives any messages of this type again. I will have it traced. Very strange, > indeed. J. Warner Mills (personally) > > Joan Hartman wrote: > > > HEY Everyone....how convenient...I just got an AUTOREPLY (see below) to my > > post because J Warner Mills has been out of the office since 12/20 > > and my question now is how come there are other emails from her with > > TODAY'S DATE OF 12/23 on them... so the email about her brother and her PD > > situations must be a routine email that goes out as an automatic > > documentation response...all I did was ask for some information.......is > > this one of those situations where ...well, you know..... Joan Hartman > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "DaRosa, Kim" <[log in to unmask]> > > To: "Joan Hartman" <[log in to unmask]> > > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 8:42 PM > > Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: J Warner Mills > > > > > I will be out of the office beginning Friday, December 20 and will return > > on > > > Monday, December 30. During that time, I will not have access to my > > emails. > > > If this is urgent, please feel free to leave me a voicemail and I will do > > my > > > best to return your call. Otherwise, I will respond to your email upon my > > > return. Thank you. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn