 |
 |
Major bills face logjam in Senate By DREW FAGAN OTTAWA BUREAU CHIEF Friday, October 31, 2003 - Page A1 Key parts of Prime Minister Jean Chrétien's legacy agenda already passed by the Commons may not become law because the Senate is now overloaded with legislation, the Government Leader in the Senate says. "There are people who want 13, or 15, or 17 [bills passed]," Senator Sharon Carstairs said in an interview yesterday. "We can't do it on two weeks notice. It's supposed to be a chamber of sober second thought." The Senate recently moved to five-day-a-week sittings to try to push through some of the key bills that the Liberal government wants to become law. But Ms. Carstairs said the 17 bills now before the Senate will be too many to handle; it normally considers in detail no more than a few bills at one time. In particular, she said, two of the pieces of legislation mentioned by Mr. Chrétien last summer as being his priorities before he leaves power are in jeopardy: the reproductive-technology bill and a broad public-safety bill. It would be possible to pass both by mid-December, Ms. Carstairs said, if Mr. Chrétien decides not to prorogue Parliament before the Liberal leadership convention, which will elect Paul Martin as the new party leader on Nov. 14. But Mr. Chrétien's intentions remain unclear. "I am doing everything I can to deliver as much of the legacy agenda as I can," said Ms. Carstairs, who has announced that she will step down as Senate leader once Mr. Chrétien leaves. Last night, Senator Jack Austin -- widely touted to lead the Senate in a Paul Martin government -- said he opposes another controversial bill before the Senate that would create an independent ethics commissioner. Ms. Carstairs expressed hope yesterday that this bill will come to a vote next week. But the tally is expected to be close; Mr. Austin is one of numerous Liberal senators who oppose the bill on grounds the government-appointed commissioner would have powers that intrude on the Senate's autonomy. "We are not against ethics. We are only against one point; that it would set a huge precedent . . . involving the operations of the Senate," said Mr. Austin, who said he is acting strictly on his own. "I've never discussed [the ethics legislation] with Paul Martin." A spokesman for Mr. Martin noted yesterday that the Liberal leader-in-waiting voted for the bill in the Commons. "He's committed to it, voted for it and it will pass eventually." The reproductive-technology bill, which passed the House of Commons this week, would ban human cloning and allow limited stem-cell research on human embryos. The public-safety bill would strengthen the regulation of biological agents and toxins that could be used as weapons, improve pipeline and powerline security, and expand sharing of information on international airline passengers. Senator John Lynch-Staunton, the Progressive Conservative leader in the Senate, said last night that those two bills likely wouldn't get through the Senate even if it continued to sit until close to Christmas. And he added that one other bill, which is of particular importance to the Martin camp, is causing controversy in the Senate. The legislation would accelerate by months the expansion of the Commons to 308 seats from 301. Mr. Martin is widely expected to call an election next spring, and he would risk offending Western Canada -- which gains most of the seats -- if he did so without the redistribution having taken effect. "I'm against it. It's a bill [to accelerate] the ambitions of one person," Mr. Lynch-Staunton said. Ms. Carstairs said a vote on the bill could take place next Friday. Last night, the Senate passed one other bill on Mr. Chrétien's legacy agenda -- the long-awaited legislation inspired by the 1992 Westray mine disaster that holds companies criminally responsible for negligence that kills or injures employees. Don Boudria, the Government House Leader, reiterated yesterday that he expects Parliament to continue sitting until Dec. 12. But many politicians aren't so sure, reasoning that Mr. Chrétien -- despite his desire to see key bills passed before he leaves power -- will prorogue Parliament on Nov. 7 rather than face daily questioning in the Commons once Mr. Martin is officially Liberal leader. However, rather than prorogue Parliament, he could only adjourn the Commons, leaving the Senate to continue its work into December. Ms. Carstairs noted that, if Parliament is prorogued, the next government could choose to reintroduce those bills that didn't pass the Senate and bypass the Commons entirely through a simple motion. But there is no guarantee, political observers say, that Mr. Martin will want to make them a priority in the short sitting he may have before he is likely to call an election. SOURCE: The Globe and Mail http://tinyurl.com/tesm * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn