Print

Print


I, too, find it amazing.  I am amazed that you would respond to two simple
yes-or-no questions and one question needing a one or two word answer with
this diatribe of accusations.  When and where is the proper "time and place"
to provide the three or four words needed to answer these questions, if not
now?

Your overreactive and evasive response to these simple questions undermines
your credibility on this issue, in my opinion.

I think we're all eager for information but all we get from you are 600 word
diatribes with no substantive content about Dr. Garg.

You mention all of the research that Dr. Garg has done.  Is there a place
that those of us eager for information can read about this research?

Look at Dr. Fink's questions which you, yourself, say are "fine".  Then,
look at your response.  Truly amazing.

Thanks,
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Parkinson's Information Exchange Network 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of callie judd
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 9:24 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Amazing!
> 
> 
> Though I have had tremendous positive feedback and supportive 
> replies from many individuals concerning our Quest for a 
> Cure, it is amazing to me the response from the medical 
> community itself!  Being the optimist that I am, I expected 
> the news of Dr. Garg to be professionally evaluated and have 
> some modicum of respect and encouragement, at least serious 
> inquiry into the postive and beneficial things he has done.  
> Rather, the doctors are the first to try to question the 
> credibility of a doctor that has been in this country 32 
> years (as an American citizen)  practicing and researching in 
> such a manner as to have discovered facts and pursued ideas 
> that have gone a positive direction to provide real answers 
> to application of research to human beings.  He has done the 
> mice and the monkey research himself (others continue to do 
> "fund raising" and keep pushing the promised "cure" back 
> farther - 5-10yr projections now!) and he has already moved 
> on to making a difference in at least a few people's lives.  
> From what I know of his background, he at least has done "no 
> harm" and takes human suffering personally and seriously. He 
> has no ambitions for "fame and fortune" and is focused on 
> doing what he feels he is best able to do - contribute to 
> medicine in a meaningful way. Judd and I know that fact about 
> him just from our specific dealings with him the past 4 
> months.  We have not found such to be the case with many 
> "notorious" doctors we have struggled to find relief through 
> for sometimes years! (If he was a "fortune seeker", he would 
> be clammering to get on Oprah's stage or somewhere in the 
> news - he's not, though I'd love for M.J.Fox or someone with 
> real public impact to open his
> story to this country).   The questions about "credibility" (board
> certification etc.) are fine and will be addressed in the 
> proper time and place, but not as a result of an 
> "interrogation" of suspicion on an internet information list. 
>  Dr. Garg deserves more professional courtesy and to be given 
> more dignity than what I have seen so far, from all the medical
> community I've approached about his story.   Where is the professional
> interest and focus on the fact that he might just be onto 
> significant answers pertaining to severe illnesses and 
> conditions and methods of performing successful neurosurgical 
> procedures?  Has anyone seen anything he has done or 
> published himself that states that he knows THE answer or all 
> the answers? No. Why do the people who offer new and creative 
> anything (sometimes not recognized for many years)get 
> persecuted and criticized quickly, with any admission of 
> truth begrudgingly given only if forced to by the facts "in 
> the end"?  Legitimate caution is one thing - but lack of will 
> to work together toward the good and the truth is another.  
> Where is the positives to balance out this negativism that 
> keeps coming?  I have my suspicions it comes from the 
> dominence of egocentrics, greed, jealousy,prejudice and 
> humans lack of Godly perspective that pervades this world.  
> So it will take individuals to make a difference....and I 
> will continue to try to do my part.  Dr. Garg also welcomes 
> the truth to come to light...for he knows who he is and what 
> he has done...and all the cynicism, skepticism, and political 
> agendas will not change that...I only hope some individuals 
> truly looking for change will be found soon and be able to 
> help - I long for all persons to be spared the pain I see in 
> my husband's eyes each day as he loses control of his life to 
> the misery of Parkinsons...Marie
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert A. Fink, M. D." <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 2:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Reply to Audrey
> 
> 
> > On 22 Dec 2003 at 21:39, callie judd wrote:
> >
> > > I doubt that they know about it - it is a pioneering medical 
> > > procedure involving MAJOR BRAIN SURGERY - I would like to 
> let them 
> > > know in person, if you have their contact information - they too 
> > > should have the opportunity to decide for themselves - all 
> > > investigations are welcomed...
> >
> > Is Dr. Garg a neurosurgeon?  Where did he train?  Is he 
> > Board-certified?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > Robert A. Fink, M. D., F.A.C.S., P. C.
> > Neurological Surgery
> > 2500 Milvia Street  Suite 222
> > Berkeley, CA  94704-2636  USA
> > 510-849-2555     FAX: 510-849-2557
> > <http://www.rafink.com/>
> > "Ex Tristitia Virtus"

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn