 |
 |
You must to have a spermatozoid alive and an egg alive also to be combined and produce an embryo alive . If they were not alive before combined there would be no embryo. As a consequence one can say when life ends (cells are death) but one can not say when the life began. So it is very arbitrary to choose when an aggregate of human cells sould start to be considered as a human being alive. Any biologist can agree on this. Best, Joao Carvalho Jeff Bayard wrote: > you say > > "Respectfully, but following the above argumentation would one say that > all the human spermatozoids and all the human eggs cells (not > defective) that there are in the world should be considered "half human > beings" at present time...and not as only as trully human cells. And > then all the followers of pro-life should say that these cells must have > to be preserved and never discarded also... > Best, > Joao Carvalho " > > But " human spermatozoids and all the human eggs cells" being held > seperately > do not constitute human life. Human life begins when the two meet and > conceive. > They are not "half human beings" No biologist would agree with you. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn