Hi, Even though I have just taught 13 writing courses this year for the McGill Writing Centre, I would never want any of the whopping numbers of papers I have corrected done for me by a machine!! A TA might be useful, but how much complex thought, how much rich ambiguity can a machine be expected to understand? To stretch my point a bit, how much computer written poetry has ever been memorable? Ok, poetry is much denser, much more packed with meaning than the average essay, but what's going on here?? Aren't we just getting swept off our feet by this mega-trend to buy into anything technology can serve up, can get us to consume more and more of? How much of these tech toys do we really need? I think there's a lot else going on too---like downsizing many of us out of our jobs to make our "beloved" universities into leaner, meaner machines. Who just wrote that it's cheaper to buy an up-graded laptop than to keep paying a lot of us our salaries. Yes/no?? Am ranting a bit, so will just refer you to a hot topic being bantered about by my management students. Does anyone know the work of a sociology proff named Geroge Ritzer? He's written a lot about "The McDonaldization of Society," part of which means the dumbing down and even destruction of many of our jobs, along with greater and greater reliance on technology to do all our work. For more on how life is becoming a robot's paradise: Best, Charlotte Hussey http://www.stedwards.edu/bss/farrall/mcdonize.htm http://www.mcspotlight.org/people/interviews/ritzer_george.html -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties, write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask] For the list archives and information about the organization, its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-