Print

Print


Due to technical difficulties, I'm sending out this message from Milla.

Abigail
=====================================
Alan et al:

I would refer you to my edition of Wisdom, as I suggested yesterday, for
a fairly detailed analysis of the Digby dialect.  It is not as late as
it looks. There are some features that, isolated, point to an earlier
date, and some of what seems late is a bit misleading -- i.e. having to
do w. the urbanity of the dialect more than its date, esp. as compared
to the dialect of the Macro Manuscript, which contains some of the same
texts, including WISDOM (the source of my interest).

  I could look up the arguments I compiled some decade ago and present a
summary here, but it will not be as convincing as I believe the
published argument to be.  Check it out and see what you think.

The important thing is that the Macro Manuscript, usually thought to be
an earlier manuscript than the Digby, is a direct COPY of the Digby.
This is indisputable.  See WISDOM:  ITS TEXTS AND CONTEXTS (AMS Press).
  Written in the early 1990s but not published until around 1999 or so.

Milla Riggio

--
Abigail Ann Young (Dr), Associate Editor/ Records of Early English Drama/
Victoria College/ 150 Charles Street W/ Toronto Ontario Canada
Phone (416) 585-4504/ FAX (416) 813-4093/ [log in to unmask]
List-owner of REED-L <http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~reed/reed-l.html>
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~reed/reed.html => REED's home page
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~reed/stage.html => our theatre resource page
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~young => my home page