 |
 |
Obviously not, but the evolution of the process of living cells in the nature are biologically similar and that's the point. Best Joao . Robert A. Fink, M. D. wrote: >On 29 Aug 2004 at 9:53, Joao Carvalho wrote: > > > >>lets do a comparison in this way: The trees have their equivalent to >>the zygotes which are theirs thousands of seeds. Now, very few ,if any >>of these hundred of thousands of seeds, may turn to be a tree, but >>following the argument of the "pro-life" then each one of these seeds >>would have to be considered a complete tree. The fact is that a >>zygote under very special favorable conditions MAY have the >>possibility to to be transformed in a complete human being, but this >>does not means that while in this stage of a zygote could be >>confounded as if it were a human being. At this stage (of zygotes ) >>they are only human undifferentiated cells and as any other (millions) >>kind of human cells, of course do also have their own DNA. Best, Joao >> >> > > >Are trees the same as human beings? > >Best, > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask] In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn